The aim of the study is to reveal the most promising atmospheric climate change indicators for RO accessible parameters in the UTLS domain for the 36 IPCC+ regions. Altogether 20 different realizations (runs) of A2 and B1 scenarios of the ECHAM5, CCSM3, and HadCM3 were considered (see Sect. 2).

Linear trends (least-square estimates), b, were calculated over 2001-2050 for each pressure level based on anomalies with respect to the 1961-1990 climatolog-ical mean. Given the regression line obtained, y(t) (Eq. 1), the regression residuals e(t) (Eq. 2) describe the deviations of the observed values y(t) from the regression line:

The variance of the residuals, se2, is given by se2 = (n - 2)-1£ ei(t)2, (3)

i where n is the number of samples (years) in the time series.

The significance of the trends was determined according to Santer et al. (2000) and Wilks (2005), using Students t-test and considering lag-1 autocorrelation (r1), reducing n to the effective sample size ne = n(l - rl)/(l + ri), which was used to determine the critical t-value. The test value tb is given by the ratio of the trend b itself and the standard error of the trend sb given by

The coefficient of determination, R2, was chosen as goodness-of-fit measure. It is the ratio of the sum of squares of deviations of the regression line from the mean value y (SSR) and the sum of squares of deviations from the mean value (SST):

Based on the results of the trend analysis, criteria for best trend indicators were formulated as follows:

• for each scenario (A2 or Bl) all—or all but one—trends have the same algebraic sign,

• at least 3/4 of all runs (A2 and Bl) show a goodness-of-fit of R2 > 0.5,

• at least 3/4 of all runs (A2 and Bl) show a statistical significance > 90% for the

The criteria were carefully selected to ensure the unveiling of the most robust spatially dependent trend characteristics of all RO accessible parameters in the UTLS region.

Was this article helpful?

## Post a comment