a Yield index: Percentage of brown rice yield after the treatment against that before the treatment bIn most cases, soils corrected from B horizon in the mountainous area were dressed cDressed with lake or river sediment a Yield index: Percentage of brown rice yield after the treatment against that before the treatment bIn most cases, soils corrected from B horizon in the mountainous area were dressed cDressed with lake or river sediment

Composting of organic inputs may offer another agricultural practice that could reduce GHG emission (Yagi and Minami 1990; Corton et al. 2000). Moreover, compost application also results in very low N2O emissions during the rice crop, that are approximately 50% lower than the emissions from rice fields treated urea (Zheng et al. 2000). However, CH4 emissions during anaerobic composting process could counterbalance gains observed after the incorporation in to the soil. This emission during composting can be reduced to a greater extent through aerobic composting techniques. Organic amendments derived from aerobic composting of rice straw, significantly reduced emission as compared to fresh straw (Corton et al. 2000). Adjusting Straw Incorporation

Crop production inevitably results in large amounts of straw residues that are typically left in the fields. Straw is often burnt to prepare the field for the next cropping cycle; especially the wheat straw is burnt almost all over the Asian rice-wheat belt (Ladha et al. 2000). Removal or burning of residues ensures farmer's quick seedbed preparation and avoids the risk of N immobilization during decomposition of residues with wide C: N ratio (Beri et al. 1995). Incomplete combustion of carbon, which is generic to smoldering fires of harvest residues generates substantial amounts of carbon monoxide (CO) and other pollutants and thus, have adverse effects on local air quality. Moreover, the burning process also releases methane and nitrous oxide into the atmosphere.

Straw incorporation influences methane emission, in two ways depending on the amount of straw added. It either increases methane emission during 2-3 week period following permanent flooding season (Sass et al. 1991) or induces early seasonal increase in CH4 emission with incorporated straw probably due to direct transformation of straw carbon to methane through microbial activity in the soil. When straw incorporation causes an increase in methane emission over the whole season, rice grain yield decreases proportionately. It may be due to the fact that an addition of straw causes an increase in root biomass, exudation and root decomposition. Addition of rice straw compost increased CH4 emission by 23-30% as compared to the 162-250% increase in emission with the use of fresh rice straw (Corton et al. 2000). In contrast, composts of cow dung and leaves decreased CH4 flux (Agnihotri et al. 1999). Inducing aerobic degradation through the addition of organic matter may significantly reduce CH4 emission (Yagi et al. 1997), but at the some time, this might increase N2O emission by nitrification of released ammonium.

In addition, an increase in methane emission with additional straw amendments depended on the method of application. Addition of rice straw also stimulates CH4 emission from flooded rice paddies. Application of rice straw at 5tha-1 and 12tha-1 increased CH4 efflux rates by factors of 2.0 and 2.4, respectively, relative to those of unamended control plots; but in plots amended with rice straw at 24tha-1 or composted rice straw at 60 tha-1, no further increase in CH4 emissions was noticed (Schutz et al. 1989). Kludze and DeLaune (1995) reported that rice straw applied at the rate of 11 tha-1 enhanced CH4 emissions, whereas 22tha-1 of rice straw retarded CH4 emissions. In a study, Rath et al. (1998) showed that the addition of rice straw distinctly increased CH4 production in alluvial soil at all moisture levels [-1.5MPa and -0.01 MPa (non flooded), 0MPa (saturated) and at a 1: 1.25 soil: water ratio (flooded)]. These results also raise the importance of many currently unknown sources of CH4, such as organic-amended non-flooded soils, as contributing to the global CH4 budget. Bossio et al. (1999) reported that straw incorporation practices altered the organic matter availability, CH4 pool and flux dynamics of rice soils, and increased emissions per unit available organic matter. However, the use of compost, among the different sources of organic materials, is considered as one of the effective means of mitigating CH4 emissions from rice fields (Neue 1993; Wassmann et al. 1993; Minami and Neue 1994).

No doubt, many studies have reported that rice straw increases CH4 emission (Nugroho et al. 1994; Yang and Chang 1997; Chidthaisong et al. 1999), but in Japanese paddy fields, because of aerobic decomposition during the fallow period, the application of straw in the previous autumn or winter decreased CH4 emission compared to just before transplantation (spring) (Hadi et al. 2001; Matsumoto et al. 2002). However, there was no difference in CH4 emission between winter application (application two-month prior) and no application (Minamikawa and Sakai 2006). Composting of rice straw is also effective in decreasing CH4 emission because of aerobic decomposition outside the field (Yagi and Minami 1990; Chidthaisong et al. 1999). Burned straw also decreases CH4 emissions from fields (Bossio et al. 1999), but CO2 emissions are increased due to burning of straw.

16.7.8 Cultivars Choice

Since there is a wide variation in CH4 emission among the rice cultivars, selection of low CH4 emitting rice cultivar may be one of the strategies to contain CH4 emission from paddy fields. Usually different cultivars of rice are selected to obtain higher yields with better quality. Characteristics of several rice cultivars, like rice growth and yield, plant conductance of CH4 transport and concentration of dissolved organic carbon in the soil play several important roles in CH4 emission. Selecting and breeding the rice cultivars, that emit lower CH4, are a desirable approach because of easy adoption. Therefore, four different points that should be kept in mind for the selection of rice cultivars that emit low CH4 are (1) varieties that has low exudation of carbon from roots, (2) that have the efficiency of a low CH4 transport and a high CH4 oxidation in the rhizosphere depending on the specific aerenchyma system in roots and shoots, (3) that have a higher harvest index in order to reduce organic matter into the soil after harvest and the last one (4) that are suitable and have a high productivity when the other mitigation options are performed.

Difference in cultivars can lead to an order of magnitude difference in methane emission (Parashar et al. 1996). In a study of five rice cultivars in irrigated fields near Beijing, China, it was observed that methane emission during the tilling-flowering stage varied by a factor of two (Lin 1993). These studies show a significant variation in methane emission, which is solely dependent on cultivars choice. Cultivars choice by individual farmers could thus greatly influence regional and global estimates of methane emission from the rice fields. The wide variation of traits and related emission rates among cultivars open the possibility for the choice of existing cultivars and the breeding of new cultivars as a method for mitigation of methane emission. Some cultivars may have more or less efficient conduits for the removal of methane from the soil through the rice plant, others may deposit more or less organic matter in the soil during the growing season or may be able to transmit more or less oxygen to the rhizosphere, thus raising the redox potential of the soil system or in other ways altering the bacterial response of the rhizosphere. In other cultivars, differential allocation of translocated carbon may even promote higher grain yield in preference to root processes and eventual methane production and emission. Methane emission may also be affected by differences among cultivars in the number of tillers, root biomass, rooting pattern, root respiration and other physiological variables.

16.7.9 Role of Microbes

All above discussed mitigating options are mostly applicable on a field scale and feasible for the farmers. These options basically affect the ecology of microorganism, but insights into microbial ecology have been disregarded in field-scale mitigation.

Variations in CH4 emission from paddy fields are attributable mostly to variations in methanotrophic activity (Schutz et al. 1989), indicating that methanotrophs are suitable organisms for controlling CH4 emission (Adachi 2001). Therefore, stimulation of the populations and/or activity of methanotrophs can decrease CH4 emission. Anaerobic CH4 oxidation occurs in ecosystems other than paddy soils (Alperin and Reeburg 1985; Iversen 1996). Although there have been no reports of the isolation of bacteria that affect anaerobic CH4 oxidation (Kumaraswamy et al. 2000), the possibility of anaerobic CH4 oxidation in paddy fields has been suggested by Miura et al. (1992) and Murase and Kimura (1994).

Amann et al. (1995) reported that probably less than 1% of bacterial species have ever been isolated. The microorganisms, that have been isolated, are not necessarily those that are the only, or the most active, ones in the soil (Le Mer and Roger 2001). As suggested by Kumaraswamy et al. (2000) and Schimel (2000), further microbial studies will enable us to predict ecosystem behaviors and the ecological significance of diversity and community structure.

The production of CH4 is controlled by flow of carbon (C) and electrons to the microbial community of methanogens during anaerobic organic matter degradation process. Also, thermodynamic constraints of in situ reactions involved and changes in the composition of microbial community affect methane production (Conrad 2002). An understanding of the in situ processes involved on a microscopic level provides leads for developing strategies for controlling methane production and emission. Conrad (2002) has reviewed the existing knowledge of microbiological data, microscopic processes, and other factors relevant for the control of methane production in wetland rice fields.

In principle, mitigation in methane production can be achieved by adding electron acceptors and oxidants. However, electron-acceptors, such as ferric iron or sulphate, are preferred for their role because they allow iron reducers to successfully compete for substrates, hydrogen and acetatae, with methanogens. This stops methane production and emission.

16.8 Conclusion

Paddy fields are one of the major anthropogenic sources of CH4 emission. For a long time, India - a large producer of staple rice food, was surmised to be major contributor to global methane budget. However, this myth was cleared when the Methane Campaign 1991 and subsequently Methane Asia Campaign 1998 categorically proved that India contributes only one tenth (3.61-4.0Tg/Yr) of the EPA projections (37.8Tg/Yr). But still, there is scope to reduce CH4 emission from paddy fields through various mitigation strategies, like water management, use of nitrification and methane inhibitors, pesticides, changes in cultural practices and crop diversification, soil amendments, selection of cultivars, and use of fermented manures. If such efforts are made globally, it will cut drastically CH4 emission from paddy fields and certainly help to postpone the danger of climate change.


Abao EB Jr, Bronson KF, Wassmann R, Singh U (2000) Simultaneous records of methane and nitrous oxide emissions in rice-based cropping systems under rain fed conditions. Nut Cyc Agroecos 58:131-139

Adachi K (2001) Methanogenic Archaea and methanotrophic bacteria in a subtropical paddy field and their interaction: Controlling methane emissions from paddy fields. Microbes Environ 16:197-205

Adhya TK, Patnaik P, Satpathy SN, Kumaraswamy S, Sethunathan N (1997) Influence of phosphorus application on methane emission and production in flooded paddy soils. Soil Biol Biochem 30:177-181

Agnihotri S, Kulshreshtha K, Singh SN (1999) Mitigation strategy to contain methane emission from rice-fields. Environ Monit Assess 58:95-104

Alperin MJ, Reeburg WS (1985) Inhibition experiments on anaerobic methane oxidation. Appl Environ Microbiol 50:940-945

Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev 59:143-169

Anastri C, Dowding M, Simpson VJ (1992) Future CH4 emissions from rice production. J Geophys Res 97:7521-7525

Arif SMA, Houwen F, Verstrate W (1996) Agricultural factors affecting methane oxidation in arable soil. Biol Fertil Soils 21:95-102

Aselman I., Crutzen PJ (1989) The global distribution of natural freshwater wetlands and rice paddies, their net primary productivity, seasonality and possible methane emission. J Atmos Chem 8:307-358

Aulakh MS, Bodenbender J, Wassmann R, Rennenberg H (2000) Methane transport capacity of rice plants. I. Influence of methane concentration and growth analysed with an automated measuring system. Nutr Cycl Agroecosys 58:357-366

Aulakh MS, Rennie DA (1985) Azide effects upon N2O emission and transformations of N in soils. Can J Soil Sci 65:205-212 Aulakh MS, Rennie DA, Paul EA (1984) Gaseous nitrogen losses from soils under Zero-till as compared with conventional-till management systems. J Environ Qual 13:130-136 Banik A, Sen M, Sen SP (1996) Effects of inorganic fertilizers and micronutrients on methane production from wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.). Biol Fertil Soils 21:319-322 Bartlett KB, Harriss RC, Seabacher DI (1985) Methane flux from coastal salt marshes. J Geophys Res 90:5710-5720

Bedard C, Knowles R (1989) Physiology, biochemistry and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH+ and

CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifers. Microbiol Rev 53:68-84 Beri V, Sidhu BS, Bahl GS, Bhat AK (1995) Nitrogen and phosphorustransformations as affected by crop residue management practices and their influence on crop yields. Soil Use Manag 11:51-54

Bharati K, Mohanty SR, Singh DP, Rao VR, Adhya TK (2000) Influence of incorporation or dual cropping of Azolla on methane emission from a flooded alluvial soil planted to rice in eastern India. Agric Ecosyst Environ 79:73-83 Bollag JM, Czlonkowski ST (1973) Inhibition of methane formation in soil by various nitrogen containing compounds. Soil Biol Biochem 5:673-678 Bossio DA, Horwath WR, Mutters RG, Kessel VC (1999) Methane pool and flux dynamics in a rice field following straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1313-1322 Bronson KF, Mosier AR (1991) Effect of encapsulated calcium carbide on dinitrogen, nitrous oxide, methane, and carbon dioxide emissions from flooded rice. Biol Fertil Soils 11:116-120 Bronson KF, Mosier AR (1994) Suppression of methane oxidation in aerobic soil by nitrogen fertilizers, nitrification inhibitors and ureases inhibitors. Biol Fertil Soils 17:263-268 Bronson KF, Mosier AR, Bishnoi SR (1992) Nitrous oxide emissions in irrigated corn as affected by encapsulated calcium carbide and nitrapyrin. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:161-165 Bronson KF, Neue HU, Singh U Abao EB Jr. (1997) Automated chamber measurements of methane and nitrous oxide flux in a flooded rice soil: I. Residue, nitrogen, and water management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:981-987 Bronson KF, Touchton JT, Hauck RD, Kelley KR (1991) Nitrogen15 recovery in winter wheat as affected by application timing and dicyandiamide. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:130-135 Cai Z, Xing G, Yan X, Xu H, Tsurta H, Yagi K, Minami K (1997) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilizers and water management. Plant Soil 196:7-14

Chanton JP, Whiting GJ, Blair NE, Lindau CW, Bollich PK (1997) Methane emission from rice:

Stable isotopes, diurnal variations, and CO2 exchange. Global Biogeochem Cycles 11:15-27 Chidthaisong A, Obata H, Watanable I (1999) Methane formation and substrate utilization in anaerobic rice soils as affected by fertilization. Soil Biol Biochem 31:135-143 Cicerone RJ and Oremland RS (1988) Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global

Biogeochem Cycles 299-327 Conard R (1993) Mechanisms controlling methane emission from wetland rice fields. In: Oremland RS (ed) The Biogeochemistry of Global Change: Radiactive Trace Gases. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 317-335

Conrad R (2002) Control of microbial methane production in wetland rice fields. Nutr Cycl Agroe-cosyst 64:59-69

Conrad R, Rothfuss F (1991) Methane oxidation in the soil surface layer of a flooded rice field and the effect of ammonium. Biol Fertil Soils 12:28-32 Corton TM, Bajita JB, Grospe FS, Pamplona RR, Asia CA, Wassmann R Jr, Lantin RS, Buendia LX (2000) Methane emission from irrigated and intensively managed rice fields in central Luzon (Philipines). Nutr Cycling Agroecosys 58:37-53 Dalton H, Hocknall HD (1990) Methane Oxidation: Is anaerobic methane oxidation possible? In: Lawson P, Alston YR (eds), Research & Development Workshop, ETSU, Harwell, UK, pp 102-113

Dalton H, Wilkins PC, Jiang Y (1993) Structure and mechanism of action the hydroxylase of soluble methane monooxygenase. In: Murrell JC, Kelly DP (eds) Microbiol Growth on C-1 Compounds. Intercept Andover, UK, pp 65-80 Denier van der Gon HAC, Neue HU (1994) Impact of gypsum application on the methane emission from a wetland rice field. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:127-137 Denier van der Gon HAC, Neue HU (1995) Influence of organic matter incorporation on the methane emission from a wetland rice field. Global Biogeochem Cycles 9:11-22 Dentener F, Peters W, Krol M, Van Weele M, Bergamaschi P, Lelieveld J (2003) Interannual variability and trend of CH4 lifetime as a measure for OH changes in the 1979-1993 time period. J Geophys Res 108 (D15), 4442, doi:10.1029/2002JD002916 Dlugokencky EJ, Dutton E, Novelli P, Tans PP (1998) Continuing decline in the growth rate of the atmospheric CH4 burden. Nature 2393:447-450 Dlugokencky EJ, Dutton E, Novelli P, Trans PP, Masarie KA, Lantz K.N. Madronich S (1996) Changes in CH4 and co growth rates after the eruption of Mt. Pinatuba and their link with change in tropical tropospheric UV flux. Geophycs Res Lett 393:447-450 Dlugokencky EJ, Houweling S, Bruhwiler L, Masarie KA, Lang PM, Miller JB, Tans PP (2003) Atmospheric methane levels off: Temporary pause or new steady state? Geophysical Research Letters, 30(19), 1992, doi:10.1029/2003GL018126 Dlugokencky EJ, Steele LP, Land PM, Masarie KA (1994) The growth rate and distribution of atmospheric methane. J Geophys Res 99:17021-17043 Drauschke G, Neumann W (1992) Investigation on influences of toxic substances on microbial methane production from cattle wastes. Zentralbl Mikrobiol 147:308-318 Dubey SK (2003) Spatio-kinetic variation of methane oxidizing bacteria in paddy soil at mid-

tillering: Effect of N-fertilizers. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 65:53-59 Dubey SK, Sinha ASK, Singh JS (2000) Spatial variation in the capacity of soil for CH4 uptake and population size of methane oxidizing bacteria in dryland rice agriculture. Curr Sci 78:617-620 Dunfield P, Knowles R, Dumnt R, Moore TR (1993) Methane production and consumption in temperature and subarctic peat soils: Response to temperature and pH. Soil Biol Biochem 25:321-326

Eller G, Frenzel P (2001) Changes in activity and community structure of methane-oxidizing bacteria over the growth period of rice. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:2395-2403 FAO (2005) FAOSTAT: Agriculture. URL: http// (last updated February 2005)

Fey A, Conrad R (2003) Effect of temperature on the rate limiting step in the methanogenic degradation pathway in rice field soil. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1-8 Flessa H, Beese F (1995) Effects of sugarbeet residues on soil redox potential and nitrous oxide emission. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1044-1051 Fung I, John J, Lerner J, Matthews E, Prather M, Steele L, Fraser P (1991) Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J Geophys Res 96:13033-13065 Furukawa Y, Tsuji T, Inubushi K (2001) Suppression of methane emission from paddy soil by application of iron materials. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 72:257-264 (in Japanese with English abstract)

Grnnfeld S, Brix H (1999) Methanogenesis and methane emissions: Effect of water table, substrate type and presence of Phragmites australis. Aqua Bot 64:63-63 Gupta M, Tyler S, Cicerone R (1996) Modeling atmospheric CH4 and the cause of recent changes in atmospheric CH4 amounts. J Geophy Res 101:22923-22932 Hadi A, Haridi M, Inubushi K, Purnomo E, Razie F, Tsuruta H (2001) Effects of land-use change in tropical peat soil on the microbial population and emission of greenhouse gases. Microbes Environ 16:79-86

Hein R, Crutzen PJ, Heimann M (1997) An inverse modeling approach to investigate the global atmospheric methane cycle. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 11:43-76 Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Seiler W (1986) Methane emission during cultivation period from an Italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 91:11803-11814

Hori K, Inubushi K, Matsumoto S, Wada H (1990) Competition for acetic acid between methane formation and sulphate reduction in the paddy soil. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61:572-578 (in Japanese with English summary) Hori K, Inubushi K, Matsumoto S, Wada H (1993) Competition for hydrogen between methane formation and sulfate reduction in a paddy soil. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 64:363-367 (in Japanese with English abstract) Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Bruce J, Lee H, Callander BA, Haites E, Harris N, Maskell K (1995) Climate Change 1994: radiative forcing and a evaluation of the IPCC IS92 emission scenarios. Cambridge University Press Cambridge Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (1996) Climate

Change, 1995: The Science of climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Houwelings T, Kaminski F, Dentener JL, Heimann M (1999) Inverse modeling of methane sources and sinks using the adjoint of a global transport model. J Geophys Res 104:26137-26160 Hua X, Guangxi X, Cai ZC, Tsuruta H (1997) Nitrous oxide emissions from three rice paddy fields in China. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 49:23-28 Hutsch BW, Webster CP, Powlson DS (1993) Long term effects of nitrogen fertilization on methane oxidation in soil of the Broadbalk wheat experiment soil. Biol Biochem 25:1307-1317 Inubushi K, Muramatsu Y, Taja D, Umebayashi M (1990) Control of methane emission from paddy soil. Proceeding of 14th International Congress of Soil Science, Kyoto, August 1990 IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007 - The Physical Science Basis Contribution of Working Group

I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, New York Iversen N (1996) Methane oxidation in coastal marine environments. In: Murrell JC, Kelly DP (eds), Microbiology of Atmospheric Trace Gases: Sources, Sink and Global Change Processes, Springer, Berlin, pp 35-68 Kanno T, Miura Y, Tsuruta H, Minami K (1997) Methane emission from rice paddy fields in all of

Japanese prefecture. Ntur Cycling Agroecosyst 49:147-151 Keerthisinghe DG, Freney JR, Mosier AR (1993) Effect of wax-coated calcium carbide and nitrapyrin on nitrogen loss and methane emission from dry-seeded flooded rice. Biol Fertil Soils 16:71-75

Keppler F, Hamilton JTG, Brass M, Rockmann T (2006) Methane emissions from terrestrial plants under aerobic conditions. Nature 439:187-191 Kimura M (1992) Methane emission from paddy soils in Japan and Thailand. In: Batges NH, Bridges EM (eds) World Inventory of Soil Emission Potentials, WISE Report 2, ISRIC, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 43-79 Kimura M, Miura Y, Watanable A, Murase J., Kuwatsuka S (1992) Methane production and its fate in paddy fields 1. Effects of rice straw application and percolation rate on the leaching of methane and other soil components into the sub soil. Soil Sci Plat Nutr 38:665-672 Kimura M, Murase J, Lu Y (2004) Carbon cycling in rice field translocation of organic materials and the fates of their end products (CO2 and CH4). Soil Biol Biochem 36:1399-1416 Kitada K, Ozaki Y, Akiyama Y, Yagi K (1993) Effects of high contact of NO3-N in irrigation water and rice straw application on CH4 emission from paddy fields. Japan J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 64:49-54 (in Japanese with English summary) Kludze HK, DeLaune RD (1995) Gaseous exchange and wetland plant response to soil redox intensity and capacity. Soil Soc Am J 59:939-945 Koyama T, Hishida M, Tomino T (1970) Influence of sea salt on the soil metabolism II: on the gaseous metabolism. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 16:81-86 Kumar U, Jain MC, Kumar S, Pathak, H, majumder D (2000) Role of nitrification inhibitors on nitrous oxide emission in a fertilized alluvial clay loam under different moisture regimes. Curr Sci 79:224-228

Kumaraswamy S, Ramakrishnan B, Satpathy SN, Rath AK, Misra S, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (1997) Spatial distribution of methane-oxidizing activity in a flooded rice soil. Plant Soil 191:241-248

Kumaraswamy S, Rath AK, Ramakrishnan B, Sethunathan N (2000) Wetland rice soils as sources and sink of methane: A review and prospects for search. Biol Fertil Soils 31:449-461 Ladha JK, Fischer KS, Hossain M, Hobbs PR, Hardy B (eds.) (2000) Improving the Productivity and Sustainability of Rice-Wheat Systems of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, Discussion Paper 2000, No. 40, IRRI, Philippines, pp 31 Lampe K (1995) Rice research: food for 4 billion people. Geo Jour 35:253-259 Le Mer, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A

review. Eur J Soil Biol 37:25-50 Lelieveld J, Crutzen PJ, Dentener FJ (1998) Changing concentration, lifetime and climate forcing of atmospheric methane. Tellus 50B:128-150 Lin E (1993) Agricultural techniques factors controlling methane emission. In: Gao L, Zheng D, Han X (eds) Proceedings of International Symposium on Climate Change, Natural Disasters and Agricultural Strategies, May 26-29, 1993, Beijing, China, China Meterological Press, Beijing, China, pp 120-126

Lindau CW, Alford DP, Bollich PK, Linscombe SD (1994) Inhibition of methane evolution by calcium sulfate addition to flooded rice. Plant Soil 158:299-301 Lindau CW, Bollich PK (1993) Methane emissions from Louisiana first and ratoon crop rice. Soil Sci 156:42-48

Lindau CW, Bollich PK, DeLaune RD, Mosier AR and Bronson KF (1993) Methane mitigation in flooded Louisiana rice fields. Biol Fertil Soils 15:174-178 Majumdar D, Kumar S, Pathak H, Jain MC, Kumar U (2000) Reducing nitrous oxide emission from rice field with nitrification inhibitors. Agric Ecosys Environ 81:163-169 Matsumoto J, Minamiyama Y, Akahori S, Takahashi K (2002) Suppression of methane emission from paddy field supplemented with organic matter. Japan J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 73:315-318 (in Japanese with English abstract) Mayer HP, Conrad R (1990) Factors influencing the population of methanogenic bacteria and the inhibition of methane production upon flooding of paddy soil. FEMS Microbiol Lett 73:103-111

McBridge BC, Wolfe RS (1971) Inhibition of methanogenesis by DDT. Nature 234:551 McCarty GW (1999) Modes of action of nitrification inhibitors. Biol Fertil Soils 29:1-9 Megraw SR, Knowles R (1989) Isolation, characterization and nitrification potential of a methy-lotroph and two heterotrophic bacteria from a consortium showing methane-dependent nitrification. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62:367-374 Minami K, Neue H-U (1994) Rice paddies as a methane source. Clim Change 27:13-26 Minamikawa K, Sakai N (2006) The practical use of water management based on soil redox potential for decreasing methane emission from a paddy field. Japan Agric Ecosys Environ 116:181-188

Minamikawa K, Sakai N, Hayashi H (2005) The effect of ammonium sulphate application on methane emission and soil carbon content of a paddy field in Japan. Agric Ecosyst Environ 107:371-379

Minamikawa K., Sakai N, Yagi K (2006) Methane emission from paddy fields and its mitigation options on a field scale. Microbes Environ 21:135-147 Mishra S, Rath AK, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (1997) Effect of continuous and alternate water regimes on methane efflux from rice under greenhouse conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 24:399-405

Miura Y, Watanabe A, J Murase J, Kimura M (1992) Methane production and its fate in paddy fields. II. Oxidation of methane and its coupled ferric oxide reduction in subsoil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 38:673-679

Mosier AR, Duxbury JM, Freney JR, Heinemeyer O, Minami K, Johnson DE (1998) Mitigating agricultural emissions of methane. Clim Change 40:39-80 Moss A (1992) Methane from ruminants in relation to global warming. Chem Ind 24:334-336 Murase J, Kimura M (1994) Methane production and its fate in paddy fields. IV. Sources of microorganisms and substrates responsible for anaerobic methane oxidation in subsoil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 40:57-61

Neue H-U (1993) Methane emission from rice fields. Bioscience 43:466-477 Neue HU, Latin RS, Wassmann R, Aduna JB, Alberto CR, Andales MJF (1994) Methane emission from rice soils of the Philippines. In: Minami K, Mosier A, Sass R (eds) CH4 and N2O: Global Emission and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial Sources, Natl Inst of Agro-Environ Sci, Tsukuba, pp 55-63 Neue HU, Sass RL (1998) The budget of methane from rice fields. IG Activities Newsletter 12:3-11

Nouchi I, Mariko S (1993) Mechanism of methane transport by rice plants. In: Oremland RS (ed)

Biogeochemistry of Global Change. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 336-352 Nouchi I, Mariko S, Aoki K (1990) Mechanism of methane transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physiol 94:59-66 Nozoe T, Nishibata T, Sekiguchi, Inoue T (1999) Effects of the addition of Fe-containing slag fertilizers on the changes in Eh in paddy soil. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:729-735 Nugroho SG, Lumbanraja J, Suprapto H, Sunyoto AWS, Haraguchi H, Kimura M (1994) Methane emission from an Indonesian paddy field subjected to several fertilizer treatments. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 40:275-281

Olivier J, Bouwman A, Berdowski J, Bloos J, Visschedijk A, Van der Mass C, Zandveld P (1999) Sectoral emission inventories of greenhouse gases for 1990 on a per country basis as well as on 1 x 1 degrees. Environ Sci Policy 2:241-263 Parashar DC, Gupta PK, Bhattacharya S (1997) Recent budget estimates from Indian paddy fields.

Ind J Radio Space Phys 26:237-243 Parashar DC, Mitra AP, Gupta PK, Rai J, Sharma RC, Singh N, Koul S, Ray HS, Das SN, Parida KM, Rao SB, Kanungo SP, Ramasami T, Nair BU, Swamy M, Singh G, Gupta SK, Singh AR, Saikia BK, Barua AKS, Pathak MG, Iyer CSP, Gopalakrishnan M, Sane PV, Singh SN, Banerjee R, Sethunathan N, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Palit P, Saha AK, Purkait NN, Chaturvedi GS, Sen SP, Sen M, Sarkar B, Banik A., Subbaraya BH, Lal S, Venkataramani S, Lal G, Chaudhary A, Sinha SK (1996) Methane budget from paddy fields in India. Chemosphere 33:737-757 Patel GB, Roth LA (1977) Effect of sodium chloride on growth and methane production of methanogens. Canadian J Microbiol 185:1167-1168 Patnaik GK, Kanungo PK, Rao VR (1994) Interaction of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) with nitrogen fixing bacterial populations and nitrogen fixation associated with rice. Microbial Res 149:291-295

Powlson DS, Goulding KWT, Willison TW, Webster CP, Hutsch BW (1997) The effect of agriculture on methane oxidation in soil. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 49:59-70 Prasad R, Power JF (1995) Nitrification inhibitors for the agriculture, health and environment. Adv Agron 54:233-281

Qu D, Ratering S, Schnell S (2004) Microbial reduction of weakly crystalline iron (III) oxides and suppression of methanogenesis in paddy soil. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 72:1172-1181 Ramakrishna C, Sethunathan N (1982) Stimulation of autotrophic ammonium oxidation in rice rhizosphere soil by an insecticide carbofuran. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:1-4 Rath AK, Swain B, Ramakrishann B, Panda D, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (1998) Influence of fertilizer management and water regime on methane in submerged rice soil. Global Change Biol 4:397-158

Rath AK, Swatin B, Ramakrishnan B, Panda D, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (1999) Influence of fertilizer management fields. Agric Ecosyst Environ 76:99-107 Rath AK, Swain B, Ramakrishnan B, Panda D, Adhya TK, Rao VR, Sethunathan N (2000) Influence of fertilizer management and water regime on methane emission from rice fields. Agric Ecosystem Environ 76:99-107 Ray RC, Ramakrishan C, Sethunathan N (1980) Nitrification inhibition in a flooded soil by hex-

achlorocyclohexane and carbofuran. Plant Soil 56:165-168 Reddy KR, Patrick Jr WH (1980) Losses of applied 15NH4-N urea 15N, and organic 15N in flooded soils. Soil Sci 130:326-330

Reeburg WS, Whalen SC, Alperin MJ (1994) The role of methylotrophy in the global methane budget. In: Microbial Growth on C1 Compounds.Intercept Ltd, Hampshire, pp 1-14 Robertson AM, Wolfe RS (1970) ATP pools in methanobacterium. J Bacteria 102:43-51 Rolston DE, Sharpley AN, Toy DW, Broadbent FE (1982) Field, measurement of denitrification:

III. Rates during irrigation cycles. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:289-296 Sahrawat KL, Parmar BS (1975) Alcohal extract of neem (Azadirachta indica L) seed as a nitrification inhibitor. J Indian Soc Soil Sc 23:131-134 Sass RL, Fisher FM, Harcombe PA, Turner FT (1991) Mitigation of methane emission from rice fields: Possible adverse effects of incorporated rice straw. Global Biogeochem Cycles 5:275-287

Sass RL, Fisher FM, Wang YB (1992) Methane emission from rice fields: The effect of floodwater management. Global Biogeochem Cycles 6:249-262 Satpathy SN, Rath AK, Mishra SR, Kumaraswamy S, Ramakrishnan B, Adhya TK, Sethunathan N (1997) Effect of chlorocyclohexane on methane production and emission from flooded rice soil. Chemosphere 34:2663-2671 Schimel J (2000) Rice, microbes and methane. Nature 403:375-376

Schutz H, Holzapfel-Pschorn A, Conrad R, Rennenberg H, Seiler W (1989) A 3-year continuous record on the influence of daytime, season and fertilizer treatment on methane emission rates from an Italian rice paddy. J Geophys Res 94:16405-16416 Schutz H, Schroder P, Rennenberg H (1991) Role of plants in regulating the methane flux to the atmosphere. In: Sharkey TD, Holland EA, Mooney HA (eds) Trace Gas Emission by Plants, Academic Press, San Diego, pp 29-63 Sebacher DI, Hassis RC, Barlett KB (1983) Methane flux across the air-water interface: Air velocity effects. Tellus 35B: 103-109 Seiler W, Conrad R, Scharffe D (1984) Field studies of methane emission from termite nests into the atmosphere and measurements of methane uptake by tropical soils. J Atmos Chem 1:171-186

Singh SN (2001) Exploring correlation between redox potential and other edaphic factors in field and laboratory condition in relation to methane efflux. Environ Internatl 27:265-274 Sprott GD, Jarrell KF, Sjaw KM, Knowles R (1982) Acetylene as an inhibitor of methanogenic bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 128:2453-2462 Sugii H, Hadi A, Acquaye S, Weiguo C, Inubushi K (1999) Effects of restrictions of root zone and percolation on methane emission from wet Andosol paddy field. Tech Bull Fac Hort Chiba Univ 53:7-13

Takai Y (1970) The mechanism of reduction in waterlogged paddy soil. Folia Microbiol 11: 304-313

Takai Y, Koyama T, Kamura T (1956) Microbial Metabolism in Reduction process of paddy soils

(Part I). Soil Plant Food 2:63-68 Topp E (1993) Effects of selected agrochemicals on methane oxidation by an organic agricultural

Soil. Can J Soil Sci 73:287-291 Tsuruta, H., Ozaki Y, Yakajima Y, Akiyama H (1998) Development of LCA method in agricultural systems: Impact assessment of rice paddy fields on atmospheric and aquatic environments. In proceedings on the third international conference on EcoBalance, Tsukuba (in Japanese), pp 209-212

Van den Pol-van Dasselar, A, Oenema O (1999) Methane production and carbon mineralization of size and density fractions of peat soils. Soil Biol Biochem 31:877-886 Vogels GD, Kjeltjens JT, Van der Drift C (1988) Biochemistry of methane production. In: Zehnder

ASB (ed) Biogeochemistry of Methane Production. John Wiley, New York, pp 707-770 Wagatsuma TK, Jujo K, Tawaraya, T, Sato AU (1992) Decrease of methane concentration and increase of nitrogen gas concentration in the rhizosphere by hygrophytes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 38:467-476

Wang B, Xu Y, Zang Z, Li Z, Ding Y, Guo Y (1999) Methane production potentials of twenty-eight rice soils in China. Biol Fertil Soils 29:74-80

Wang Z, Kludze H, Crozier CR, Patrik WH Jr (1995) Soil characteristics affecting methane production and emission in flooded rice. In: Peng S, Ingarm KT, Neue H-U, Ziska LH (eds) Climate Change and Rice, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 80-90 Wang Z, Van Cleemput O, Baert L (1991) Effect of Urease inhibitors on denitrication in soil. Soil Use Manag 7:230-233

Wang ZP, Lindau C, DeLaune RD and Patrick WH Jr (1992) Methane production from anaerobic soil amended with rice straw and nitrogen fertilizers. Fert Res 33:115-121 Wang ZP, Lindau CW, DeLaune RD, Patrick WH Jr (1993) Methane emission and entrapment in flooded rice soils as affected by soil prosperities. Biol Fertil Soils 16:163-168 Wassmann R, Buendia LV, Lantin RS, Bueno C, Lubigan LA, Umali A, Nocon NN, Javellana AM, Neue H-U (1999) Mechanism of crop management on methane emissions from rice fields in Los Banos, Phillippines. Nutr Cycling Agroecosys 58:107-119 Wassmann R, Lamtin RS, Neue HU, Buendia LV, Corton TM, Lu Y (2000) Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia: III. Mitigation options and future research needs. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 58:23-36 Wassmann R, Neue HU, Bueno C, Lantin RS, Alberto MCR, Buendia LV, Bronson K, Papen H, Rennenberg H (1998) Methane production potentials of different soils derived from intrinsic and exogenous substrates. Plant Soil 203:227-237 Wassmann R, Papen H, Rennenberg H (1993) Methane emission from rice paddies and possible mitigation strategies. Chemosphere 26:201-217 Watanable A, Kimura M (1999) Influence of chemical properties of soils on methane emission from rice paddies. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30:2449-2463 Watanable A, Takedia T, Kimura M (1999) Evaluation of origins of CH4 carbon emitted from rice paddies. J Geophys Res 104:23623-23629 Whalen SC, Reeburg WS, Sandbeek KA (1990) Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill covers soil.

Appl Environ Microbiol 56:3405-3411 Willison TW, Webster CT, Goulding KTW, Powlson DS (1995) Methane oxidation in temperate soils: effects of land use and the chemical form nitrogen fertilizer. Chemosphere 30:539-546 Wuebbles DJE, Hayhoe K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Science Reviews 177:(57) 210, 2002.

Yagi K (1997) Methane emissions from paddy fields. Bull Netl Inst Agro-environ Sci 14:96-210 Yagi K, Minami K (1990) Effects of organic matter applications on methane emission from

Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36:599-610 Yagi K, Tsuruta H, Minami K (1997) Possible options for mitigating methane emission from rice cultivation. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 49:213-220 Yagi K, Tsuruta H, Minami K, Chairoj P, Cholitkul W (1994) Methane emission from Japanese and Thai paddy fields. In: Minami K, Moiser A, Sass R (eds), CH4 and N2O: Global Emission and Controls from Rice Fields and Other Agricultural and Industrial Sources, Natl. Inst. of Agro-Environ. Sci., Tsuluba, pp 41-53 Yan X, Ohara T, Akimoto H (2003) Development of region-specific emission factirs and estimation of methane emission from rice fields in the East, Southeast and South Asian countries. Global Change Biol 9:237-254

Yanagisawa M (1978) Degraded paddy soil. In: Kawaguchi K (ed) Paddy Soil Science. Kodan-sha, Tokyo, pp 425-431

Yang SS, Chang HL (1997) Effects of environmental conditions on methane production and emission of paddy soil. Agric Ecosystem Environ 69(1):69-80 Yao H, Conrad R, Wassmann R, Neue H-U (1999) Effects of soil characteristics on sequential reduction and methane production in sixteen rice paddy soils from China, the Philippines, and Italy. Biogeochemistry 47:269-295 Yao H, Zhang YH (1996) Estimation of methane emission from rice paddies in mainland China.

Global Biogeochem Cycles 10:641-649 Yoshiba M, Morimura T, Aso S, Takenaga H (1996) Methane production and control in submerged soil applied with Mn++, Fe3+ and SO|- rich materials. Japan J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 67:362-370 (in Japanese with English abstract)

Zeikus JG (1977) The biology of methanogenic bacteria. Bacteriol Rev 41:514-541 Zheng XH, Wang MX, Wang YS, Shen RX, Gou J, Li J,Jin JS, Li LT (2000) Impact of soil moisture on nitrous oxide emission from croplands: a case study on the rice-based agro-ecosystem in Southeast China. Chemosphere - Global Change Sci 2:207-224 Zheng YH, Deng GB, Lu GM (1997) Eco-economic benefits of rice-fish-duck complex ecosystem. J ApplEcol 84:431-434

Was this article helpful?

0 0
Organic Gardeners Composting

Organic Gardeners Composting

Have you always wanted to grow your own vegetables but didn't know what to do? Here are the best tips on how to become a true and envied organic gardner.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment