The ion-exchange process has been used effectively in the field of waste disposal. The use of continuous ion exchange and resin regeneration systems has further improved the economic feasibility of the applications over the fixed-bed systems. One of the reported  special npnHvl^ HI
applications of the ion-exchange resins has been the removal of ABS by the use of a Type II porous anion exchanger that is a strong base and depends on a chloride cycle. This resin system is regenerated by removing a great part of the ABS absorbed on the resin beads with the help of a mixture of hydrocarbons (HC) and acetone. Other organic pollutants can also be removed by ion-exchange resins, and the main problem is whether the organic material can be eluted from the resin using normal regeneration or whether it is economically advisable to simply discard the used resin. Wang and Wood  and Wang [51,52,66] successfully used the ion-exchange process for the removal of cationic surfactant from water.
The separation of ionic from nonionic substances can be effected by the use of ion exclusion . Ion exchange can be used to purify glycerine for the final product of chemically pure glycerine and reduce losses to waste, but the concentration of dissolved ionizable solids or salts (ash) largely impacts on the overall operating costs. Economically, when the crude or sweet water contains under 1.5% ash, straight ion exchange using a cation and anion mixed bed can be used, whereas for higher percentages of dissolved solids, it is economically feasible to follow the ion exchange with an ion-exclusion system. For instance, waste streams containing 0.2-0.5% ash and 3-5% glycerine may be economically treated by straight ion exchange, while waste streams containing 5-10% ash and 3-5% glycerine have to be treated by the combined ion-exchange and ion-exclusion processes.
Was this article helpful?