The presence of fats, oil, and grease (FOG) in dairy processing wastewater can cause all kinds of problems in biological wastewater treatment systems onsite and in public sewage treatment facilities. It is therefore essential to reduce, if not remove FOG completely, prior to further treatment. According to the IDF , factories processing whole milk, such as milk separation plants as well as cheese and butter plants, whey separation factories, and milk bottling plants, experience the most severe problems with FOG. The processing of skim milk seldom presents problems in this respect.
As previously mentioned, flow balancing is recommended for dairy processing plants. An important issue, however, is whether the FOG treatment unit should be positioned before or after the balancing tank . If the balancing tank is placed before the FOG unit, large fat globules can accumulate in the tank as the discharged effluent cools down and suspended fats aggregate during the retention period. If the balancing tank is placed after the FOG removal unit, the unit should be large enough to accommodate the maximum anticipated flow from the factory. According to the IDF , it is generally accepted that flow balancing should precede FOG removal. General FOG removal systems include the following.
Gravity Traps. In this extremely effective, self-operating, and easily constructed system, wastewater flows through a series of cells, and the FOG mass, which usually floats on top, is removed by retention within the cells. Drawbacks include frequent monitoring and cleaning to prevent FOG buildup, and decreased removal efficiency at pH values above 8 .
Air Flotation and Dissolved Air Flotation. Mechanical removal of FOG with dissolved air flotation (DAF) involves aerating a fraction of recycled wastewater at a pressure of about 400-600 kPa in a pressure chamber, then introducing it into a flotation tank containing untreated dairy processing wastewater. The dissolved air is converted to minute air bubbles under the normal atmospheric pressure in the tank [6,32]. Heavy solids form sediment while the air bubbles attach to the fat particles and the remaining suspended matter as they are passed through the effluent [6,9,25]. The resulting scum is removed and will become odorous if stored in an open tank. It is an unstable waste material that should preferably not be mixed with sludge from biological and chemical treatment processes since it is very difficult to dewater. FOG waste should be removed and disposed of according to approved methods . DAF components require regular maintenance and the running costs are usually fairly high.
Air flotation is a more economical variation of DAF. Air bubbles are introduced directly into the flotation tank containing the untreated wastewater, by means of a cavitation aerator coupled to a revolving impeller . A variety of different patented air flotation systems are available on the market and have been reviewed by the IDF . These include the "Hydrofloat," the "Robosep," vacuum flotation, electroflotation, and the "Zeda" systems.
The main drawback of the DAF , is that only SS and free FOG can be removed. Thus, to increase the separation efficiency of the process, dissolved material and emulsified FOG solutions must undergo a physico-chemical treatment during which free water is removed and waste molecules are coagulated to form larger, easily removable masses. This is achieved by recirculating wastewater prior to DAF treatment in the presence of different chemical solutions such as ferric chloride, aluminum sulfate, and polyelectrolytes that can act as coalescents and coagulants. pH correction might also be necessary prior to the flotation treatment, because a pH of around 6.5 is required for efficient FOG removal .
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of FOG. Cammarota et al.  and Leal et al.  utilized enzymatic preparations of fermented babassu cake containing lipases produced by a Penicillium resrictum strain for FOG hydrolysis in dairy processing wastewaters prior to anaerobic digestion. High COD removal efficiencies as well as effluents of better quality were reported for a laboratory-scale UASB reactor treating hydrolyzed dairy processing wastewater, and compared to the results of a UASB reactor treating the same wastewater without prior enzymatic hydrolysis treatment.
Was this article helpful?