Anaerobic Digestion

Anaerobic digestion of abattoir solid wastes is not common in the United States, UK, or elsewhere, despite the potential for stabilization of the solid residues with the added bonus of fuel gas production. Cooper et al. [30] looked at the potential in New Zealand for production of methane from both the solid and liquid fraction of abattoir wastes. Based on tests carried out by Buswell and Hatfield in 1939, they concluded that paunch contents and fecal matter would not give an economic return. In these very early tests it was reported that a retention time of 38-40 days might be required and that the expected gas yield would be 2500 ft3/lb solids added (156 m3/kg). In the UK the first of a new generation of well-mixed digestion plants to treat slaughterhouse wastes was installed in 1984 to treat all the paunch wastes, blood, and settlement tank solids produced by a small abattoir in Shropshire. The operation and performance of a 3531 ft3 (100 m3) demonstration-scale anaerobic digester treating cattle and lamb paunch contents, blood, and process wastewaters from a slaughterhouse was described by Banks [4]. Anaerobic digestion of the solid fraction of abattoir wastes suffers from low methane production and solid reduction as well as requiring a longer retention time compared to sewage and food processing wastes [30]. Steiner et al. [60] reported the failure of a digester when treating a mixture of abattoir wastes. The mixture contained 13% of rumen and intestine contents, 25% of manure from animal buildings, 44% of surplus sludge from an aerobic sewage treatment plant, and 19% fat derived from the fat separator, and exhibited a COD of 165 g/L, a BOD of 112 g/L, a dry weight of 120 g/L, and a volatile solids concentration of 105 g/L consisting of 25% fat and 23% protein. The experiment was carried out in a cylindrical completely mixed reactor with a capacity of 0.07 ft3 (2 L). When the organic loading rate was raised to more than 73 lb VS/103 gal day (8.75 g VS/L day), digestion failure occurred and was caused by enrichment of volatile acids in the digester. In his paper, Banks [4] also mentioned serious problems associated with the accumulation of ammonia concentration in the process. Several other authors also indicate that where blood and fat form a significant proportion of the feedstock it is found to be digestible in only limited quantities due to an inhibitory effect on methanogenesis, thought to be caused by accumulation of toxic intermediates produced by the hydrolysis/acidification stages [57,92,93].

Using a two-stage anaerobic process, Banks and Wang [94] successfully overcame the toxicity problems associated with the accumulation of ammonia and volatile fatty acids when treating a mixture of cattle paunch contents and cattle blood. The first-stage reactor was operated in a hydraulic flush mode to maintain a significantly shorter liquid retention time than the solids retention time of the fibrous components in the feedstock. The firststage reactor was run in this mode using solids retention times of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 days with liquid retention of between 2 and 5 days. Up to 87% solid reductions were achieved compared to a maximum of 50% when the control reactor was operated in single-pass mode with solids and liquid retentions of equal duration. The liquid effluent from the first stage hydrolysis reactor was treated by a second-stage completely-mixed immobilized-cell digester. Operated at a retention time of between 2 and 10 days with loading rates in the range of 36-437 lb/103 ft3 day (0.58-7.0 kg COD/m3 day), the second stage reactor achieved a COD removal of 65-78% with a methane conversion efficiency between 2 and 4 ft3 CH4/lb COD removed (0.12-0.25 m3 CH4/kg COD removed).

Other than these few reports there has been little research on the anaerobic digestion of the solid waste fraction and it is clear that certain conditions and waste types lead to operational instability. Early work questions the economic viability of the digestion process when used only for the treatment of paunch content and intestinal fecal material and it may be necessary to look at the codigestion of slaughterhouse waste fractions with other waste materials. One successful operation is the Kristianstad biogas plant in Sweden, which coprocesses organic household waste, animal manure, gastrointestinal waste from two slaughterhouses, biosludge from a distillery, and some vegetable processing waste [95]. The slaughterhouse waste fraction is 24,600 tonnes per annum of a total throughput of 71,200 tonnes which is treated in the 1.2 Mgal (4500 m3) digester. The plant biogas production was equivalent to 20,000 MWh and the digester residue is returned to the land as a fertilizer. The plant represents an environmentally friendly method of waste treatment and appears to have overcome the problems of trying to digest slaughterhouse solid wastes in isolation.


1. USEPA. Development document for the proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the meat and poultry products industry. Office of Water (4303T), United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), EPA-821-B-01-007, 2002.

2. Council of the European Communities. Council Directive on health problems affecting the production and marketing of meat products and certain other products of animal origin. Official J. Eur. Comm. 1977, L 026 (31 October 1977), 0085-0100.

3. Warris, P.D. Meat Science: An Introductory Text; CABI Publishing: New York, 2000.

4. Banks, C.J. Anaerobic digestion of solid and high nitrogen content fractions of slaughterhouse wastes. In Environmentally Responsible Food Processing; Niranjan, K., Okos, M.R., Rankowitz, M., Eds.; Vol. AIChE Symposium Series. American Institute of Chemical Engineers: New York, 1994; 103-109.

5. European Commission. Survey of wastes spread on land—Final report; Gendebien, A., Ferguson, R., Brink, J., Horth, H., Sullivan, M., Davis, R., Brunet, H., Dalimier, F., Landrea, B., Krack, D., Perot, J., and Orsi, C; Report No. CO 4953-2; Directorate-General for Environment, 2001.

6. Denmead, C.F. Methane production from meat industry wastes and other potential methods for their utilization, Publication no. 602; Meat Industry Research Institute; Hamilton, New Zealand, 1977.

7. Fernando, T. Utilization of Paunch Content Material by ultrafiltration. Process Biochem. 1980,

8. Pollack, H. Biological waste disposal from slaughterhouses. In Anaerobic Digestion and

Carbohydrate Hydrolysis ofWastes; Ferrero, G.L., Ferranti, M.P. Naveau, H., Eds.; Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: London and New York, 1984:323-330.

9. Brolls, E.K.; Broughton, M. The treatment of effluents arising from the animal by-products industry. In Food Industry Wastes: Disposal and Recovery; Herzka, A., Booth, R.G., Eds.; Applied Science Publishers: London and New Jersey, 1981; 184-203.

10. Grady, C.P.L.; Lim, H.C. Biological Wastewater Treatment: Theory and Applications; Marcel Dekker Inc: New York, 1980.

11. AEA Technology. Environmental Technology Best Practice Programme: Reducing Water and Effluent Costs in Red Meat Abattoirs, Report no. GG234; AEA Technology: Harwell, UK, 2000.

12. Johnson, A.S. Meat. In Industrial Wastewater Control; Gurnham, C.F., Ed.; Academic Press: New York and London, 1965.

13. World Bank. Meat processing and rendering. In Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook; World Bank: Washington DC, 1988:336-340.

14. Johns, M.R. Developments in wastewater treatment in the meat processing industry: a review. Biores. Technol 1995, 54, 203-216.

15. Nemerow, N.L.; Agardy, F.J. Origin and characteristics of meat-packing wastes. In Strategies of Industrial and Hazardous Waste Management; Agardy, F.J., Ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York, 1998; 427-432.

16. Carawan, R.E.; Pilkington, D.H. Reduction in load from a meat-processing plant—beef. Randolph Packing Company/North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, 1986.

17. UNEP. Cleaner production in meat processing. COWI Consulting Engineers/UNEP/Danish Environmental Protection Agency, 2000.

18. Dart, M.C. Treatment of meat trade effluents. In Practical Waste Treatment and Disposal; Dickinson, D., Ed.; Applied Science Publishers Ltd: London, 1974; 75-86.

19. Denker, D.O.; Grothman, D.L.; Berthouex, P.M.; Scully, L.J.P.; Kerrigan, J.E.O. Characterization and potential methods for reducing wastewater from in-plant hog slaughtering operations; Interim Report to Mayer and Company/University of Wisconsin, 1973.

20. USEPA. Development document for effluent limitation guidelines and new source performance standards for red meat segment of the meat product and rendering processing point source category; Effluent Guidelines Division, Office of Air and Water Programs, USEPA, EPA-440/1 -74-012a, 1974.

21. Macon, J.A.; Cote, D.N. Study of meat packing wastes in North Carolina; Industrial Extension Service, School of Engineering, North Carolina State College, 1961.

22. Millamena, S.M. Ozone treatment of slaughterhouse and laboratory wastewaters. Aquacult. Eng. 1992, 11, 23-31.

23. Lloyd, R.; Ware, G.C. Anaerobic digestion of waste waters from slaughterhouses. Food Manuf. 1956, 31, 511-515.

24. Kostyshyn, C.R.; Bonkoski, W.A.; Sointio, J.E. Anaerobic treatment of a beef processing plant wastewater: a case history. Proceedings of 42nd Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN , 1987, 673-692.

25. Jayangoudar, I.; Thanekar, A.; Krishnamoorthi, K.P.; Satyanarayana, S. Growth potentials of algae in anaerobically treated slaughterhouse waste. Indian J.Environ. Health 1983, 25, 209213.

26. Gariepy, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Couillard, D.; Tran, F. Thermophilic process for protein recovery as an alternative to slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Biol. Waste. 1989, 29, 93-105.

27. Enders, K.E.; Hammer, M.; Weber, C.L.; Anaerobic lagoon treatment of slaughterhouse waste. Water Sewage Works 1968; 115, 283-288.

28. Borja, R.; Banks, C.J.; Wang, Z. Performance and kinetics of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor treating slaughterhouse wastewater. J.Environ. Sci. Heal. A 1994, 29, 2063-2085.

29. Arora, H.C.; Routh, T. Treatments of slaughterhouse effluents by anaerobic contact filter. Indian Assoc. Water Pollut. Control 1980, 16, 67-78.

30. Cooper, R.N.; Heddle, J.F.; Russell, J.M. Characteristics and treatment of slaughterhouse effluents in New Zealand. Prog. Wat. Treat. 1979, 11, 55-68.

31. Dart, M.C. Treatment of waste waters from the meat industry. Process Biochem. 1974, 9, 1114.

32. Council of the European Communities. Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive 91/271/EEC. Off. J.Eur. Comm., 1991, 1135/40-52, (30 May 1991).

33. Eldridge, E.F. Meat-packing and slaughterhouse wastes. In Industrial Waste Treatment Practice; McGraw-Hill, London and New York, 1942.

34. Hopwood, D. Effluent treatment in meat and poultry processing industries. Process Biochem. 1977, 72, 5-8.

35. Meat and Livestock Australia Ltd. Eco-Efficiency Manual for Meat Processing, ABN 39 081 678 364 (MLA), 2002.

36. Camin, K.Q. Cost of waste treatment in the meat packing industry. In Proceedings of 25th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University Lafayette, IN, 1970; 193-202.

37. Masse, D. L; Masse, L. Characterization of wastewater from hog slaughterhouses in Eastern Canada and evaluation of their in-plant wastewater treatment systems. Can. Agr. Eng. 2000, 42, 131-137.

38. Travers, S.M.; Lovett, D.A. Pressure flotation of slaughterhouse wastewaters using carbon dioxide. Water Res. 1985, 19, 1479-1482.

39. Hans Huber. Wastewater treatment in slaughterhouses and meat processing factories; Technical brochure; Hans Huber AG, Maschinen-und-Andagenbau: Berching, Germany, 2002.

40. Hans Huber. Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment in combination with flotate sludge dewatering, practice report/application info; Hans Huber AG, Maschinen-und-Andagenbau: Berching, Germany, 2002.

41. Peavy, H.S.; Rowe, D.R.; Tchobanoglous, G. Environmental Engineering; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1986.

42. USEPA. Development document for effluent limitation guidelines and new source performance standards for the poultry segment of the meat product and rendering processing point source category; USEPA, EPA-440/1-75-03Ib, 1975.

43. Steffen, A.J. Stabilisation ponds for meat packing wastes. J.Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 1963; 35, 440-444.

44. Rollag, D.A.; Dornbush, J.N. Design and performance evaluation of an anaerobic stabilization pond system for meat-processing wastes. J.Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 1966, 38, 1805-1812.

45. Witherow, J.L. Small meat-packers waste treatment systems. In Proceedings of28th Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, 1973; 994-1009.

46. Wymore, A.H.; White, J.E. Treatment of slaughterhouse waste using anaerobic and aerated lagoons. Water Sewage Works 1986; 115, 492-498.

47. Black, M.G.; Brown, J.M.; Kaye, E. Operational experiences with an abattoir waste digester plant at Leeds. Water Pollut. Control, 1974, (73), 532-537.

48. Bohm, J.L. Digestion anaerobie des effluents d'abattoirs dans une unite pilote de 3000 litres epuration et production d'energie. Entropie 1986, 130-131, 83-87.

49. Cillie, G.G.; Henzen, M.R.; Stander, G.J.; Baillie, R.D. Anaerobic digestion IV. The application of the process in waste purification. Water Res. 1969, 3, 623-643.

50. Hemens, J.; Shurben, D.G. Anaerobic digestion of wastewaters from a slaughterhouse. Food Trade Rev. 1959, 29, 2-7.

51. Andersen, D.R.; Schmid, L.A. Pilot plant study of an anaerobic filter for treating wastes from a complex slaughterhouse. In Proceedings of 40th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN, 1985; 87-98.

52. Festino, C.; Aubart, C. Optimisation of anaerobic digestion of slaughterhouse wastes and mixtures of animal wastes with sewage sludges and slaughterhouse wastes. Entropie 1986, 130131, 20.

53. Narbonne, C.; Fromantin-Souli. Epuration d'effluents liquides et valorisation energetique de dechets solides d'abattoir par voie anaerobie. Entropie 1986, 130-131, 57-60.

54. Rajeshwari, K.V.; Balakrishnan, M.; Kansal, A.; Lata, K.; Kishore, V.V.N. State-of-the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renew. Sust. Energy. Rev. 2000, 4, 135-156.

55. Nell, J.H.; Krige, P.R. The disposal of solid abattoir waste by composting. Water Res. 2000,5,1177-1189.

56. Meat Industry Research Institute. The anaerobic treatment of effluent from meat processing operations; Denmead, C.F. Publication no. 405, 1974.

57. Vollmer, H.; Scholz, W. Recycle international In 4th International Recycling Congress; Thome-Kozmiensky, K.J., Ed. Berlin, 1984; 667-671.

58. Wheatley, A.D.; Cassell, L. Effluent treatment by anaerobic biofiltration. WaterPollut. Control 1985, 84, 10-22.

59. Campagna, R.; Del Medico, G.; Pieroni, M. Methane from biological anaerobic treatment of industrial organic wastes. In 3rd EC Conference on Energy from Biomass; Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: London & New York, 1985.

60. Steiner, A.E.; Wildenauer, F.X.; Kandler, O. Anaerobic digestion and methane production from slaughterhouse wastes. In 3rd Energy Conservation Conference; Elsevier Applied Science Publishers: London & New York, 1985.

61. Sayed, S.; van Campen, L.; Lettinga, G. Anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse waste using a granular sludge UASB reactor. Biol Waste. 1987; 27, 11-28.

62. Sayed, S.; De Zeeuw, W. The performance of a continuously operated flocculent sludge UASB reactor with slaughterhouse wastewater. Biol Waste. 1988, 24, 213-226.

63. Ross, W.R. Anaerobic treatment of industrial effluents in South Africa. Water SA 1989, 15, 231-246.

64. Marchaim, U.; Levanon, D.; Danai, O.; Musaphy, S. A suggested solution for slaughterhouse wastes: uses of the residual materials after anaerobic digestion. Biores. Technol. 1991, 37, 127134.

65. Tritt, W.P. The anaerobic treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater in fixed-bed reactors. Biores. Technol. 1992,47,201-207.

66. Polprasert, C.; Kemmadamrong, P.; Tran, F.T. Anaerobic Baffle Reactor (ABR) process for treating a slaughterhouse wastewater. Environ. Technol. 1992; 13, 857-865.

67. Sayed, S.K.I.; van der Spoel, H.; Truijen, G.J.P. A complete treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater combined with sludge stabilization using two stage high rate UASB process. Water Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 83-90.

68. Kaul, S.N. Biogas from industrial wastewaters. J.IPHEIndia 1986, 3, 5-17.

69. Mara, D.D.; Pearson, H.W. Design Manual for Waste Stabilisation Ponds in Mediterranean Countries; Lagoon Technology International: Leeds, 1998.

70. USEPA. Design Manual: Municipal Wastewater Stabilization Ponds; USEPA, EPA 625/1-83016, 1983.

71. US Department of Health Education and Welfare. An Industrial Waste Guide to the Meat Industry, USDHEW. US Public Health Service Publication No. 386, 1958.

72. Philips, S.A. Wastewater treatment handles cattle killing waste. Water Sewage Works 1975 122, 50-51.

73. Parker, D.S.; Lutz, M.P.; Pratt, A.M. New trickling filter applications in the USA. Water Sci. Technol. 1990, 22, 215-226.

74. Tchobanoglous, G.; Burton, F.L. Wastewater Engineering: Metcalf& Eddy, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1991.

75. Bull, M.A.; Sterritt, R.M.; Lester, J.N. The treatment of wastewaters from the meat industry: a review. Environ. Tech. Lett. 1982, 3, 117-126

76. Blanc, F.C.; O'Shaughnessy, J.C.; Corr, S.H. Treatment of soft drink bottling wastewater from bench-scale treatability to full-scale operation. In Proceedings of 38th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference; Purdue University, Lafayette, In, 1984; 243-256.

77. Bilstad, T. Upgrading slaughterhouse effluent with rotating biological contactors. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Fixed-Film Biological Processes; Wu, Y.C., Smith, E.D. Miller, R.D., Eds. Kings Island: Ohio, USA, 1982; 892-912.

78. Bibby, J. Innovative Technology Reduces Costs for a Meat Processing Plant; Waterlink, Inc. 2002 (

79. Gariepy, S.; Jyagi, R.D.; Couillard, D.; Tran, F. Thermophylic process for protein recovery as an alternative to slaughterhouse wastewater treatment. Biol Waste. 1989, 29, 93-105.

80. Council of the European Communities. Regulation (EC) no. 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002. Laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption. Offi. J.Eur. Comm., 2002. L 273/1-95 (10 October 2002).

81. Heddle, J.H. Activated sludge treatment of slaughterhouse wastes with protein recovery. Water Res. 1979, 73, 581-584.

82. Lovett, D.A.; Travers, S.M.; Davey, K.R. Activated sludge treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater—I. Influence of sludge age and feeding pattern. Water Res. 1984, 18, 429-434.

83. Travers, S.M.; Lovett, D.A. Activated sludge treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater—II. Influence of dissolved oxygen concentration. Water Res. 1984, 18, 435-439.

84. Irvine, R.L.; Miler, G.; Bhamrah, A.S. Sequencing batch treatment of wastewater in rural areas. J. Wat. Pollut. Control Fed. 1979, 57, 244.

85. Hadjinicolaou, J. Evaluation of a controlled condition in a sequencing batch reactor pilot plant operation for treatment of slaughterhouse wastewaters. Can. Agr. Eng. 1989, 31, 249-264.

86. EIDN. Nutrient Removal System for Treatment of Abattoir Wastewater. Environmental Case Studies Directory; Environmental Industries Development Network,, 2002.

87. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. Manure Production and Characteristics; Standard ASAE D384.1, 1999.

88. Wang, Z. Evaluation of a Two Stage Anaerobic Digestion System for the Treatment of Mixed Abattoir Wastes. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST), UK, 1996.

89. USEPA. Guide to Field Storage ofBiosolids; Office of Wastewater, EPA/832-B-00-007, United States Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.

90. Meat Industry Research Institute. Stabilization of Save-All Bottom Solids Including Paunch Material, by Composting; Supapong, B. Publication no. 336, 1973.

91. Australian Environment Protection Authority. Authorised officers manual, EPA 95/89, 1995.

92. Rooke, C.D. Pilot Scale Studies on the Anaerobic Digestion of Abattoir Waste; BSc Industrial Biology Dissertation, Southbank Polytechnic: Borough Rd, London, UK, 1988.

93. Cox, D.J.; Banks, C.J.; Hamilton, I.D.; Rooke, C.D. The Anaerobic Digestion of Abattoir Waste at Bishops Castle Meat Co. Part I and 11. Meat and Livestock Commission Report, MLC: Milton Keynes, UK, 1987.

94. Banks, C.J.; Wang, Z. Development of a two phase anaerobic digester for the treatment of mixed abattoir wastes. Water Sci. Technol 1999, 40, 67-76.

95. Centre for Renewable Energy, Environmental Technology Support Unit (ETSU). Co-Digestion of Manure with Industrial and Household Waste, Technical Brochure No. 118. AEA Technology: Harwell, UK, 2000.

Organic Gardeners Composting

Organic Gardeners Composting

Have you always wanted to grow your own vegetables but didn't know what to do? Here are the best tips on how to become a true and envied organic gardner.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment