Choice of activity data

There are two main types of activity data for estimating CH4 emissions from manure management: (1) animal population data; and (2) manure management system usage data.

The animal population data should be obtained using the approach described in Section 10.2. As noted in Section 10.2, it is good practice to conduct a single livestock characterisation that will provide the activity data for all emissions sources relying on livestock population data. It is important to note, however, that the level of disaggregation in the livestock population data required to estimate emissions from manure management, may differ from those used for other sources, such as Enteric Fermentation. For example, for some livestock population species/categories, such as cattle, the enhanced characterisation required for the Tier 2 enteric fermentation estimate could be aggregated to broader categories that are sufficient for this source category. For other livestock species, such as swine, it may be preferable to have more disaggregation of weight categories for manure management calculations than for enteric fermentation. However, consistency in total livestock categories should be retained throughout the inventory.

Inventory agencies in countries with varied climatic conditions are encouraged to obtain population data for each major climatic zone. In addition, where possible, the associated annual average temperature for locations where livestock manure is managed in liquid-based systems (e.g., pits, tanks, and lagoons) should be obtained. This will allow more specific selection of default factors or MCF values for those systems more sensitive to temperature changes. Ideally, the regional population breakdown can be obtained from published national livestock statistics, and the temperature data from national meteorological statistics. If regional data are not available, experts should be consulted regarding regional production (e.g., milk, meat, and wool) patterns or land distribution, which may provide the required information to estimate the regional animal distributions.

To implement the Tier 2 method, the portion of manure managed in each manure management system must also be collected for each representative animal species. Table 10.18 summarizes the main types of manure management systems. Quantitative data should be used to distinguish whether the system is judged to be a solid storage or liquid/slurry. The borderline between dry and liquid can be drawn at 20% dry matter content. Note that in some cases, manure may be managed in several types of manure management systems. For example, manure flushed from a dairy freestall barn to an anaerobic lagoon may first pass through a solids separation unit where some of the manure solids are removed and managed as a solid. Therefore, it is important to carefully consider the fraction of manure that is managed in each type of system.

The best means of obtaining manure management system distribution data is to consult regularly published national statistics. If such statistics are unavailable, the preferred alternative is to conduct an independent survey of manure management system usage. If the resources are not available to conduct a survey, experts should be consulted to obtain an opinion of the system distribution. Volume 1, Chapter 2 Approaches to Data Collection describes how to elicit expert judgement. Similar expert elicitation protocols can be used to obtain manure management system distribution data.

Guide to Alternative Fuels

Guide to Alternative Fuels

Your Alternative Fuel Solution for Saving Money, Reducing Oil Dependency, and Helping the Planet. Ethanol is an alternative to gasoline. The use of ethanol has been demonstrated to reduce greenhouse emissions slightly as compared to gasoline. Through this ebook, you are going to learn what you will need to know why choosing an alternative fuel may benefit you and your future.

Get My Free Ebook


Post a comment