The Role of Space Weather and Cosmic Ray Effects in Climate Change
Lev I. Dorman
Head of Cosmic Ray and Space Weather Center with Emilio Segre Observatory, affiliated to Tel Aviv University, TECHNION and Israel Space Agency, P.O. Box 2217, Qazrin 12900, Israel Chief Scientist of Cosmic Ray Department of IZMIRAN Russian Academy of Science, Troitsk 142090, Moscow Region, Russia
1. Introduction
2. Solar Activity, Cosmic Rays and Climate Change
2.1. Long Term Cosmic Ray Intensity Variations and Climate Change
2.2. The Possible Role of Solar Activity and Solar Irradiance in Climate Change
2.3. Cosmic Rays as an Important Link between Solar Activity and Climate Change
2.4. The Connection between Galactic Cosmic Ray Solar Cycles and the Earth's Cloud Coverage
2.5. The Influence of Cosmic Rays on the Earth's Temperature
2.6. Cosmic Ray Influence on Weather during Maunder Minimum
2.7. The Influence of
Long Term Variations of Cosmic Ray Intensity on Wheat Prices (Related to Climate Change) in Medieval England and Modern USA
2.8. The Connection between Ion Generation in the Atmosphere by Cosmic Rays and Total Surface of Clouds
2.9. The Influence of Big Magnetic Storms (Forbush Decreases) and Solar Cosmic Ray Events on Rainfall
2.10. The Influence of Geomagnetic Disturbances and Solar Activity on the Climate through Energetic Particle Precipitation from Inner Radiation Belt
Climate Change: Observed Impacts on Planet Earth
Copyright © 2009 by Elsevier B.V. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. 43
2.11. On the Possible Influence of Galactic Cosmic
Rays on Formation of Cirrus Hole and Global Warming
2.12. Description of Long Term Galactic Cosmic Ray Variation by both Convection Diffusion and Drift Mechanisms with Possibility of Forecasting of Some Part of Climate Change in
Near Future Caused by Cosmic Rays
2.13. Influence of Long Term Variation of Main Geomagnetic Field on Global Climate Change through Cosmic Ray Cutoff Rigidity Variation
2.14. Atmospheric lonisation by Cosmic Rays: The Altitude Dependence and Planetary Distribution
2.15. Project 'Cloud' as an Important Step in Understanding the Link between Cosmic Rays and Cloud Formation
3. The Influence on the Earth's Climate of the Solar System Moving Around the Galactic Centre and Crossing Galaxy Arms
4. The Influence of Molecular dust Galactic Clouds on the Earth's Climate
5. The Influence of Interplanetary Dust Sources on the Earth's Climate
6. Space Factors and Global Warming
7. The Influence of Asteroids on the Earth's Climate
8. The Influence of Nearby Supernova on the Earth's Climate
9. Discussion and Conclusions Acknowledgments References
1. INTRODUCTION
There are a number of space phenomena that influence the Earth's climate and determined its long-term and short-term changes. These include:
• the variability of the Sun's irradiation flux energy;
• the variations of the Earth's orbital characteristics;
• the variable solar activity (with periods of 8 15 a (year), average period of about 11 a), general solar magnetic field (average period of 22 a) together with the related phenomena of variable solar wind, coronal mass ejections and shocks in the Heliosphere and modulated galactic cosmic rays (CR) see Section 2;
• the solar CR generated during great solar flares see Section 2.9;
• the precipitation of energetic electrons and protons from the Earth's magnetosphere during magnetic disturbances see Section 2.10;
• the variable Earth's magnetic field's influence on CR cutoff rigidity and changed galactic and solar cosmic ray intensity in the Earth's atmosphere see Section 2.12;
• the moving of the solar system around the galactic centre and crossing the Galaxy arms see Section 3;
• the impacts of the solar system with galactic molecular dust cloud see Section 4;
• the impacts of the solar system with interplanetary zodiac dust cloud see Section 5;
• asteroid impacts see Section 7;
• nearby supernova explosions see Section 8.
The first phenomenon is the subject of Chapter 2 by Shabtai Cohen, and the second is dealt with by Lucas Lourens in Chapter 5. In this Chapter the other phenomena are discussed and compared to anthropogenic induced changes. Details on CR behaviour in the Earth's atmosphere, magnetosphere and in space are the subject of recent publications by the author [1 3]. The role of these factors in our present climate change will be discussed in the final section of this chapter.
2. SOLAR ACTIVITY, COSMIC RAYS AND CLIMATE CHANGE
2.1. Long-Term Cosmic Ray Intensity Variations and Climate Change
About 200 a ago the famous astronomer William Herschel [4] suggested that the price of wheat in England was directly related to the number of sunspots. He noticed that less rain fell when the number of sunspots was small (Joseph in the Bible, recognised a similar periodicity in food production in Egypt, about 4000 a ago). The solar activity level is known from direct observations over the past 450 a, and from data of cosmogenic nuclides (through CR intensity variations) for more than 10 000 a [1,5]. Over this period there is a striking qualitative correlation between cold and warm climate periods and high and low levels of galactic CR intensity (low and high solar activity). As an example, Fig. 1 shows the change in the concentration of radiocarbon during the last millennium (a higher concentration of 14C corresponds to a higher intensity of galactic CR and to lower solar activity). It can be seen from Fig. 1 that during 1000 1300 AD the CR intensity was low and solar activity high, which coincided with the warm medieval period (during this period Vikings settled in Greenland). After 1300 AD solar activity decreased and CR intensity increased, and a long cold period followed (the so-called Little Ice Age, which included the Maunder minimum 1645 1715 AD and lasted until the middle of nineteenth century).
2.2. The Possible Role of Solar Activity and Solar Irradiance in Climate Change
Friis-Christiansen and Lassen [7,8] found, from 400 a of data, that the filtered solar activity cycle length is closely connected to variations of the average surface temperature in the northern hemisphere. Labitzke and Van Loon [9]
|
A |
Medieval W |
arm |
/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
/ |
\ |
Age |
J | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Vik |
ings in Gre |
v enland |
w |
\f | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
■ |
Ma |
under Minin |
1200 1400 Years 1600 1800 1000 1200 1400 Years 1600 1800 FIGURE 1 The change of CR intensity reflected in radiocarbon concentration during the last millennium. The Maunder minimum refers to the period 1645 1715, when sun spots were rare. From Ref. [6]. showed, from solar cycle data, that the air temperature increases with increasing levels of solar activity. Swensmark [6] also discussed the problem of the possible influence of solar activity on the Earth's climate through changes in solar irradiance. But the direct satellite measurements of the solar irradiance during the last two solar cycles showed that the variations during a solar cycle was only about 0.1%, corresponding to about 0.3 Wm 2. This value is too small to explain the present observed climate changes [10]). Much bigger changes during a solar cycle occur in UV radiation (about 10%, which is important in the formation of the ozone layer). High [11] and Shindell et al. [12] suggested that the heating of the stratosphere by UV radiation can be dynamically transported into the troposphere. This effect might be responsible for small contributions towards 11 and 22 a cycle modulation of climate but not to the 100 a of climate change that we are presently experiencing. 2.3. Cosmic Rays as an Important Link between Solar Activity and Climate Change Many authors have considered the influence of galactic and solar CR on the Earth's climate. Cosmic Radiation is the main source of air ionisation below 40 35 km (only near the ground level, lower than 1 km, are radioactive gases from the soil also important in air ionisation) [1]. The first to suggest a possible influence of air ionisation by CR on the climate was Ney [13]. Swensmark [6] noted that the variation in air ionisation caused by CR could potentially influence the optical transparency of the atmosphere, by either a change in aerosol formation or influence the transition between the different phases of water. Many other authors considered these possibilities [13 22]. The possible statistical connections between the solar activity cycle and the corresponding long-term CR intensity variations with characteristics of climate change were considered in Dorman et al. [23 25]. Dorman et al. [26] reconstructed CR intensity variations over the last 400 a on the basis of solar activity data and compared the results with radiocarbon and climate change data. Cosmic radiation plays a key role in the formation of thunderstorms and lightnings [1]. Many authors [27 32] have considered atmospheric electric field phenomena as a possible link between solar activity and the Earth's climate. Also important in the relationship between CR and climate, is the influence of long-term changes in the geomagnetic field on CR intensity through the changes of cutoff rigidity [2]. One can consider the general hierarchical relationship to be: (solar activity cycles + long-term changes in the geomagnetic field) ! (CR long-term modulation in the Heliosphere + long-term variation of cutoff rigidity) ! (long-term variation of clouds covering + atmospheric electric field effects) ! climate change. 2.4. The Connection between Galactic Cosmic Ray Solar Cycles and the Earth's Cloud Coverage Recent research has shown that the Earth's cloud coverage (observed by satellites) is strongly influenced by CR intensity [6,18,20 22]. Clouds influence the irradiative properties of the atmosphere by both cooling through reflection of incoming short wave solar radiation, and heating through trapping of outgoing long wave radiation (the greenhouse effect). The overall result depends largely on the height of the clouds. According to Hartmann [33], high optically thin clouds tend to heat while low optically thick clouds tend to cool (see Table 1). From Table 1 it can be seen that low clouds result in a cooling effect of about 17 Wm 2, which means that they play an important role in the Earth's radiation budget [34 36]). The important issue is that even small changes in the lower cloud coverage can result in important changes in the radiation budget and hence has a considerable influence on the Earth's climate (let us remember that the solar irradiance changes during solar cycles is only about 0.3 Wm 2). Figure 2 shows a comparison of the Earth's total cloud coverage (from satellite observations) with CR intensities (from the Climax neutron monitor (NM)) and solar activity data over 20 a. From Fig. 2 it can be seen that the correlation of global cloud coverage with CR intensity is much better than with solar activity. Marsh and Swensmark [21] came to conclusion that CR intensity relates well with low global cloud coverage, but not with high and middle clouds (see Fig. 3). It is important to note that low clouds lead, as rule, to the cooling of the atmosphere. It means that with increasing CR intensity and cloud coverage
The positive forcing increases the net radiation budget of the Earth and leads to a warming; negative forcing decreases the net radiation and causes a cooling. (Note that the global fraction implies that 36.7% of the Earth is cloud free.) The positive forcing increases the net radiation budget of the Earth and leads to a warming; negative forcing decreases the net radiation and causes a cooling. (Note that the global fraction implies that 36.7% of the Earth is cloud free.)
1980 1985 1990 1995 Years FIGURE 2 Changes in the Earth's cloud coverage: triangles from satellite Nimbus 7, CMATRIX project [37]; squares from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, ISCCP [38]; diamonds from the Defence Meteorological Satellite Program, DMSP [39,40]. Solid curve CR intensity variation according to Climax NM, normalized to May 1965. Broken curve solar radio flux at 10.7 cm. All data are smoothed using twelve months running mean. From Ref. [6]. 1980 1985 1990 1995 YearsFIGURE 2 Changes in the Earth's cloud coverage: triangles from satellite Nimbus 7, CMATRIX project [37]; squares from the International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project, ISCCP [38]; diamonds from the Defence Meteorological Satellite Program, DMSP [39,40]. Solid curve CR intensity variation according to Climax NM, normalized to May 1965. Broken curve solar radio flux at 10.7 cm. All data are smoothed using twelve months running mean. From Ref. [6]. (see Fig. 2), we can expect the surface temperature to decrease. It is in good agreement with the situation shown in Fig. 1 for the last 1000 a, and with direct measurements of the surface temperature over the last four solar cycles (see Section 2.5, below). "D
10 O 1980 1985 1990 YearsFIGURE 3 CR intensity obtained at the Huancayo/Haleakala NM (normalised to October 1965, curve 2) in comparison with global average monthly cloud coverage anomalies (curves 1) at heights, H, for: a high clouds, H > 6.5 km, b middle clouds, 6.5 km >H > 3.2 km, and c low clouds, H < 3.2 km. From Ref. [21]. 10 O 1980 1985 1990 Years 1995 S" FIGURE 3 CR intensity obtained at the Huancayo/Haleakala NM (normalised to October 1965, curve 2) in comparison with global average monthly cloud coverage anomalies (curves 1) at heights, H, for: a high clouds, H > 6.5 km, b middle clouds, 6.5 km >H > 3.2 km, and c low clouds, H < 3.2 km. From Ref. [21]. 2.5. The Influence of Cosmic Rays on the Earth's Temperature Figure 4 shows a comparison of 11 year moving average Northern Hemisphere marine and land air temperature anomalies for 1935 1995 with CR intensity (constructed for Cheltenham/Fredericksburg for 1937 1975 and Yakutsk for 1953 1994, [41]) and Climax NM data, as well as with other parameters (unfil-tered solar cycle length, sunspot numbers and reconstructed solar irradiance). From Fig. 4 one can see that the best correlation of global air temperature is with CR intensity, in accordance with the results described in Sections 2.1 2.4 above. According to Swensmark [6], the comparison of Fig. 4 with Fig. 2 shows that the increase of air temperature by 0.3 °C corresponds to a decrease of CR intensity of 3.5% and a decrease of global cloudiness of 3%; this is equivalent to an increase of solar irradiance on the Earth's surface of about 1.5 Wm 2 [42] and is about 5 times bigger than the solar cycle change of solar irradiance, which as we have seen, is only 0.3 Wm 2).
1935 1950 1965 1980 1995 Years 1935 1950 1965 1980 1995 Years a
1935 1950 1965 1980 1995 Years
1935 1950 1965 1980 1995 Years FIGURE 4 Eleven year average Northern hemisphere marine and land air temperature anomalies, At, (broken curve) compared with: a, unfiltered solar cycle length; b, Eleven year average CR intensity (thick solid curve from ion chambers 1937 1994, normalized to 1965, and thin solid curve from Climax NM, normalized to ion chambers); c, eleven year average of sunspot numbers; and d, decade variation in reconstructed solar irradiance from Ref. [10] (zero level corresponds to 1367 Wm 2). From Ref. [6]. 1935 1950 1965 1980 1995 Years d 1935 1950 1965 1980 1995 YearsFIGURE 4 Eleven year average Northern hemisphere marine and land air temperature anomalies, At, (broken curve) compared with: a, unfiltered solar cycle length; b, Eleven year average CR intensity (thick solid curve from ion chambers 1937 1994, normalized to 1965, and thin solid curve from Climax NM, normalized to ion chambers); c, eleven year average of sunspot numbers; and d, decade variation in reconstructed solar irradiance from Ref. [10] (zero level corresponds to 1367 Wm 2). From Ref. [6]. 2.6. Cosmic Ray Influence on Weather during Maunder Minimum Figure 5 shows the situation in the Maunder minimum (a time when sunspots were rare) for: solar irradiance [10,43]); concentration of the cosmogenic isotope 10Be [44] a measure of CR intensity [1]); and reconstructed air surface temperature for the northern hemisphere [45]). The solar irradiance is almost constant during the Maunder minimum and about 0.24% (or about 0.82 Wm 2) lower than the present value (see Panel a in Fig. 5), but CR intensity and air surface temperature vary in a similar manner see above sections; with increasing CR intensity there is a decrease in air surface temperature (see Panels b and c in Fig. 5). The highest level of CR intensity was between 1690 1700, which corresponds to the minimum of air surface temperature [46] and also to the coldest decade (1690 1700). 1368 1367 1366 1365 1364 1368 1367 1366 1365 1364
1660 1680 1700 Years 1720 FIGURE 5 Situation in the Maunder minimum: a reconstructed solar irradiance [9]; b cosmo genic 10Be concentration [44]; c reconstructed relative change of air surface temperature, At, for the northern hemisphere [45]. From Swensmark [6]. 1660 1680 1700 Years 1720 FIGURE 5 Situation in the Maunder minimum: a reconstructed solar irradiance [9]; b cosmo genic 10Be concentration [44]; c reconstructed relative change of air surface temperature, At, for the northern hemisphere [45]. From Swensmark [6]. 2.7. The Influence of Long-Term Variations of Cosmic Ray Intensity on Wheat Prices (Related to Climate Change) in Medieval England and Modern USA Herschel's observations [4] mentioned in Section 2.1, were based on the published wheat prices [47], and showed that five prolonged periods of sunspot numbers correlated with costly wheat. This idea was taken up by the English economist and logician William Stanley Jevons [48]. He directed his attention to the wheat prices from 1259 to 1400 and showed that the time intervals between high prices were close to 10 11 a. This work was later published by Rogers [49]. The coincidence of these intervals with the period of the recently discovered 11 year cycle of solar activity led him to suggest that the solar activity cycle was a 'synchronisation' factor in the fluctuations of wheat prices (Jevons [50]). As a next step, he extrapolated his theory to stock markets of the nineteenth century in England and was impressed by a close coincidence of five stock exchange panics with five minima in solar spot numbers that preceded these panics. He suggested that both solar and economic activities are subjected to a harmonic process with the same constant period of 11 a. However, the subsequent discovery of the non-harmonic behaviour of solar cycles, with periods varying from 8 to 15 a, and the later observation of lack of coincidence between panics predicted by Jevons [48,50] and the actual ones, destroyed his argument. The Rogers [49] database was used by Pustil'nik et al. [51], Pustil'nik and Yom Din [52] to search for possible influences of solar activity and CR intensity on wheat prices (through climate changes). The graph of wheat prices as a function of time (Fig. 6) contains two specific features: 1. A transition from 'low price' state to 'high price' state during 1530 1630, possibly as a result of access to cheap silver, recently discovered New World. 2. The existence of two populations in the price sample: noise-like variations with low amplitude bursts and several bursts of large amplitude. Pustil'nik et al. [51], Pustil'nik and Yom Din [52], analysed the data and compared the distribution of intervals of price bursts with the distribution of the intervals between minimums of solar cycles (see Fig. 7). In their analysis they found that for the sunspot minimum minimum interval distribution the estimated parameters are: median 10.7 a; mean 11.02 a; standard deviation 1.53 a and for the price burst interval distribution, the estimated parameters are: median 11.0 a; mean 11.14 a; and standard deviation 1.44 a. The main problem with a comparison between the price and solar activity, is the absence of the time interval, common to sunspot observation data Year's Wheat Prices in the Middle Ages England Year's Wheat Prices in the Middle Ages England
Years FIGURE 6 Wheat prices in England during 1259 1702 with a price transition at 1530 1630. From Refs. [51,52]. Years FIGURE 6 Wheat prices in England during 1259 1702 with a price transition at 1530 1630. From Refs. [51,52]. Hystogram of Price Bursts Intervals Hystogram of Price Bursts Intervals
Hystogram of the Sunspot Min-Min intervals Hystogram of the Sunspot Min-Min intervals
Intervals FIGURE 7 Histograms of the interval distribution for price bursts for the period, 1249 1702, and of minimum minimum intervals of sunspots during 1700 2000. From Refs. [51,52]. IntervalsFIGURE 7 Histograms of the interval distribution for price bursts for the period, 1249 1702, and of minimum minimum intervals of sunspots during 1700 2000. From Refs. [51,52]. (for 1700 2001) and wheat price data (1259 1702). However, the discovery of a strong correlation between the concentration of 10Be isotopes in Greenland ice and CR intensity (according to measurements of CR intensity over the last 60 a [1]) sheds a new light on the problem. In Fig. 8, the wheat prices for 1600 1702 are shown and compared to 10Be data [53]. White marks show prices, averaged for three-year intervals centred on moments of minimum CR intensity. Black marks correspond to average prices in three-year intervals for maximum CR intensities. As can be seen from Fig. 8, all prices in the neighbourhoods of the seven maxima of CR intensity (correspond approximately to minima of solar activity) 1588 1599 1610 1621 1632 1643 1654 1665 1676 1687 1698 1709 Years FIGURE 8 Systematic differences in wheat prices at moments of minimum and maximum CR intensity determined according to 10Be data [53]. White diamonds show prices averaged for three year intervals centred on moments of minimum CR intensity (maximum solar activity); black rectangles show prices averaged over three year intervals centred on moments of maximum CR intensity (minimum solar activity). White and black triangles show prices at moments of minimum and maximum CR intensity. From Ref. [52].
1588 1599 1610 1621 1632 1643 1654 1665 1676 1687 1698 1709 Years FIGURE 8 Systematic differences in wheat prices at moments of minimum and maximum CR intensity determined according to 10Be data [53]. White diamonds show prices averaged for three year intervals centred on moments of minimum CR intensity (maximum solar activity); black rectangles show prices averaged over three year intervals centred on moments of maximum CR intensity (minimum solar activity). White and black triangles show prices at moments of minimum and maximum CR intensity. From Ref. [52]. are systematically higher than those in the neighbourhood of the seven minima of CR intensity (maxima of solar activity) in the long-term variation of CR intensity according to 10Be data [53]. A similar result was obtained by Pustil'nik and Yom Din [54] for wheat prices in USA during twentieth century. 2.8. The Connection between Ion Generation in the Atmosphere by Cosmic Rays and Total Surface of Clouds The time variation of the integral rate of ion generation, q, (approximately proportional to CR intensity) in the middle latitude atmosphere at an altitude between 2 and 5 km was found by Stozhkov et al. [55] for the period January 1984 August 1990 using regular CR balloon measurements. The relative change in q, Aq/q, have been compared with the relative changes of the total surface of clouds over the Atlantic Ocean, AS/S, and are shown in Fig. 9: the correlation coefficient is 0.91 ± 0.04. This result is in good agreement with results described above (see Panel b in Fig. 4 and Panel c in Fig. 5) and shows that there is a direct correlation between cloud cover and CR generated ions. 2.9. The Influence of Big Magnetic Storms (Forbush Decreases) and Solar Cosmic Ray Events on Rainfall A decrease of atmospheric ionisation leads to a decrease in the concentration of charge condensation centres. In these periods, a decrease of total cloudiness
Continue reading here: The Role of Volcanic Activity in Climate and Global Change Was this article helpful? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||