Agarwal, A., & Narain, S. (1991). Global warming in an unequal world. New Delhi, India: Centre for Science and Environment.
Banuri, T., Goran-Maler, K., Grubb, M., Jacobson, H. K., & Yamin, F. (1996). Equity and social considerations. In: J. P. Bruce, H. Lee & E. Haites (Eds), Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change (pp. 79-124). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. New York: Oxford University Press.
Benestad, O. (1994). Energy needs and CO2 emissions: Constructing a formula for just distributions. Energy Policy, 22(9), 725-734.
Blanchard, O., Criqui, P., Trommetter, M., Viguier, L. (2001). Equity and efficiency in climate change negotiations: A scenario for world emission entitlements by 2030. In: Cahier de recherche, No. 26 (p. 67). Grenoble, France: Institut d'Economie et de Politique de l'Energie.
Bodansky, D. (1993). The UN framework convention on climate change: A commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451-458.
Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology. (2000, January). Technical note on the time-dependent relationship between emissions of greenhouse gases and climate change. Brazilian Ministry of Science and Technology.
Chichilnisky, G., & Heal, G. (1993). Global environmental risks. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(4), 5-86.
Chichilnisky, G., & Heal, G. (1994). Who should abate carbon emissions? An international viewpoint. Economic Letters, 44, 443-449.
Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44.
Cooper, R. (1998). Toward a real treaty on global warming. Foreign Affairs, 77, 66-79.
Edmonds, J., & Wise, M. (1997). Exploring a technology strategy for stabilizing atmospheric CO2. Paper presented at the international workshop on economic impacts of annex I actions on all countries.
Fisher-Vanden, K., Shukla, P. R., Edmonds, J. A., Kim, S. H., & Pitcher, H. M. (1997). Carbon taxes and India. Energy Economics, 19, 289-325.
Global Commons Institute. (1996). Draft proposals for a climate change protocol based on contraction and convergence. Contribution to AGBM. Available at: http://www.gci. org.uk/contconv/protweb.html
Grubb, M. J. (1989). The greenhouse effect: Negotiating targets. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Hayes, P. (1993). North-south transfer. In: P. Hayes & K. R. Smith (Eds), The global greenhouse regime: Who pays? (pp. 144-168). London: Earthscan Publishers.
Heller, T., & Shukla, P. R. (2003). Development and climate - engaging developing countries. In: Beyond Kyoto: Advancing the international effort against climate change (pp. 111-140). Washington, DC: The Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Harris, N., Kattenberg, A., & Maskell, K. (Eds) (1996). Climate change 1995: The science of climate change. Contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Hyder, T. O. (1992). Climate negotiations: The north/south perspective. In: I. Mintzer (Ed.), Confronting climate change: risks, implications, and responses (pp. 323-336). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001a). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis: Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001b). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001c). Climate change 2001: Mitigation: Contribution of working group III to the IPCC third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001d). Climate change 2001: Synthesis report: Contributions of working group I, II, and III to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jepma, C. J., & Munasinghe, M. (1998). Climate change policy: Facts, issues, and analyses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
Kverndokk, S. (1995). Tradable CO2 emission permits: Initial distribution as a justice problem. Environmental Values, 4, 129-148.
McKibbin, W., & Wilcoxen, P. (2002). Climate change policy after Kyoto: Blueprint for a realistic approach. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Michaelowa, A., Butzengeiger, S., & Jung, M. (2003). Graduation and deepening: An ambitious post-2012 climate policy scenario. Hamburg Institute of International Economics (with FNI, CRIEPI, CASS, IHDP/IDGEC).
Muller, B. (1999). Justice in global warming negotiations: How to obtain a procedurally fair compromise. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, EV26.
Nordhaus, W. (2001). After Kyoto: Alternative mechanisms to control global warming. Paper presented at the joint session of American Economic Association and Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rayner, S., & Malone, E. (1997). Human choice and climate change: An international social science assessment. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
Richels, R., Edmonds, J., Gruenspecht, H., & Wigley, T. (1996). The Berlin Mandate: The design of cost-effective mitigation strategies. Draft Paper. Presented at the IEA conference on Climate Change Strategies.
Rose, A. (1990). Reducing conflict in global warming policy: Equity as a unifying principle. Energy Policy, 18, 927-935.
Rose, A., & Stevens, B. (1993). The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for CO2 emissions. Resources and Energy Economics, 15, 117-146.
Schelling, T. C. (2002). What makes greenhouse sense? Time to rethink the Kyoto Protocol. Foreign Affairs, 2-9.
Shukla, P. R. (1996a). The modelling of policy options for greenhouse gas mitigation in India. AMBIO, 25(4), 240-248.
Shukla, P. R. (1996b). When and where aspects of climate change mitigation actions: A developing country perspective. In: Proceedings of IPCC symposium on ''Integrated Assessment Process," Toulouse, France.
Shukla, P. R. (1999). Justice, equity, and efficiency in climate change: A developing country perspective. In: F. Toth (Ed.), Fair weather?: Equity concerns in climate change. London: Earthscan Publications.
Shukla, P. R., Sharma, S. K., Ravindranath, N. H., Bhattacharyya, S., & Garg, A. (Eds) (2003). Climate change and India: Vulnerability assessment and adaptation. Hyderabad, India: Universities Press.
Smith, K. R., Swisher, J., & Ahuja, D. R. (1993). Who pays (to solve the problem and how much)? In: P. Hayes & K. R. Smith (Eds), The global greenhouse regime: Who pays? (pp. 70-98). London: Earthscan Publishers.
Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES). (2000). IPCC special report on emission scenarios. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toman, M., & Burtraw, D. (1991). Resolving equity issues: Greenhouse gas negotiations. Resources, 103, 10-13.
United Nations. (2002). Johannesburg declaration - Report of the world summit on sustainable development. Document No. A/C0NF.199/20. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1992). Articles. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (1997). Kyoto protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. New York: United Nations.
Victor, D. G. (2001). International agreements and the struggle to tame carbon. In: J. M. Griffin (Ed.), Global climate change: The science, economics and politics (pp. 204-229). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wigley, T. M. L., Jain, A. K., Joos, F., Nyenzi, S., & Shukla, P. R. (1997). Implications of proposed CO2 emissions limitations. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on climate change.
PART 3: POLITICAL PERSPECTIVES
This page intentionally left blank
Was this article helpful?
Always wanted to get a better deal but didn't have the needed negotiation skills? Here are some of the best negotiation theories. The ability to negotiate is a skill which everyone should have. With the ability to negotiate you can take charge of your life, your finances and your destiny. If you feel that others are simply born with the skill to negotiate, you should know that everyone can learn this wonderful skill.