Aim and research questions

The aim of this dissertation is to examine how the interplay between policy and knowledge production affects the framing of Arctic climate change. The emphasis is on analyzing how structures of international cooperation can shape knowledge production. It will also discuss how knowledge production influences policy. The empirical basis is the history, process, and content of Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) with an analytical focus on the following questions:

An Agenda for Scientific Research"; Carl Folke, "Resilience: The Emergence of a Perspective for Social-Ecological Systems Analyses," Global Environmental Change 16, (2006): 253. E.g. Oran R. Young, The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change. Fit, Interplay, and Scale (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002); Ronald B. Mitchell, William C. Clark, David W. Cash, and Nancy M. Dickson, eds. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence (Boston: MIT Press, 2006).

Folke, et al. "Synthesis: Building Resilience and Adaptive Capacity in Social-Ecological Systems," 373.

Oran R. Young, "Institutions and the Growth of Knowledge: Evidence From International Environmental Regimes," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4, (2004): 215; Virginia M. Walsh, Global Institutions and Social Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2004); Leslie King, "Competing Knowledge Systems in the Management of Fish and Forests in the Northwest Pacific," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4, (2004): 161; Louis Lebel, Antonio Contreras, Suparb Pasong, and Po Garden, "Nobody Knows Best: Alternative Perspectives in Forest Governance in Southeast Asia," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4, (2004): 111; Syma A. Ebbin, "Black Box Production of Paper Fish. An Examination of Knowledge Construction and Validation in Fisheries Management Institutions," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 4, (2004): 143-159.

• How is climate change framed in the ACIA? Whose knowledge traditions come to the fore? What knowledge is highlighted?

• How do different framings of Arctic climate change relate to structures of international cooperation?

The structures most in focus are international regimes, but also with attention to how these issue-specific cooperative efforts relate to large-scale changes in the structure of international society. The analysis also pays attention to the role of individual actors and networks of actors and how they relate to regimes. The study is used as a basis for discussing what the ACIA history and process might tell about the potential for future climate knowledge production and policy in regional arenas. The following section provides a short introduction to the topic of Arctic climate change.

Was this article helpful?

0 0

Post a comment