To summarize, although the concept of regimes is important to understanding the politics of knowledge production, its focus on issue-specific principles, norms, structures, and decision-making procedures may not be sufficient. First, a focus on structure needs to include attention to primary institutions of international society and their roles in strengthening the power of some knowledge traditions over others. Second, concepts from actor-network theory can be used for understanding the connections between the macro-level of the international system with the micro-level sociology of science that often is in focus in science and technology studies. Third, there is a need to study how, why, and when actor networks become solidified and gain power, not only through black-boxed technologies and scientific theories as discussed by Latour, but also by becoming part of formal political regimes. A fourth point to add is that political actors are not only states. In the ACIA, indigenous peoples' organizations were important transnational actors as were individual scientists and scientific organizations.
Was this article helpful?