Criticisms of the Green Revolution

The Green Revolution has been a much-debated subject. The initial euphoria during the late 1960s of the high-yielding wheat and rice varieties — and more intensive crop production practices — was followed by a wave of criticism. Some criticism reflected a sincere concern about social and economic problems in rural areas that were not — and cannot — be solved by technology alone. Some criticism was based on premature analyses of what was actually happening in areas where the Green Revolution technologies were being adopted. Some criticism focused on issues of environmental damage and sustainability. Many of these criticisms have some element of truth to them. Obviously, wealth has increased in irrigated areas, relative to less-favored rainfed regions, thus increasing income disparities. Cereals, with their higher yield potential, have displaced pulses and other lower-yielding crops. Farm mechanization has displaced low-paid laborers. High-yielding cereal varieties have replaced lower-yielding land races.

For those whose main concern is protecting the "environment," what would the world have been like without the technological advances that have occurred? Had the global cereal yields of 1950 still prevailed in 1999, we would have needed nearly 1.2 billion ha of additional land of the same quality — instead of the 660 million that was used.

Obviously, such a surplus of land was not available, and certainly not in Asia, where the population increased from 1.2 to 3.8 billion over the time period. Moreover, if more environmentally fragile land had been brought into agricultural production, the impact on soil erosion, loss of forests, grasslands, and biodiversity, and extinction of wildlife species would have ensued.

The debate on benefits and shortcomings of the Green Revolution must be framed within the larger context of population growth. The continuing decline in the real price of cereals also needs to be considered. Lower food costs benefit everybody in society, but especially the poor consumer. Finally, the very strong growth linkages between Green Revolution technology and industrial development are also apparent. Indeed, much of Asia's spectacular economic development in industry and services over the past 20 years has followed in the wake of the agricultural revolutions that preceded them.

Was this article helpful?

+15 -18

Responses

  • kati
    What are the critic of green revolution?
    3 years ago
  • medhane
    What are the criticisms of Green revolution in Nigeria ?
    3 years ago
  • eula hale
    What isthe criticism ofgreen revolution?
    1 year ago
  • Dominik
    What is the criticism of green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • amaranth
    What is the criticidm of green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • Fiammetta
    What is the criticim of green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • Yonatan
    What is the criticisim of green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • Riley
    What is the critism of green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • ahti
    What is the criticims of green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • elise
    What is the criticism of green revolutuon?
    1 year ago
  • Gustava
    What do critics say of the green revolution?
    1 year ago
  • Kaj
    What are 3 criticsms of the green revoltion?
    11 months ago
  • Matilda
    What are praises and criticisms of the green revolution?
    11 months ago
  • Russell
    Why weren't green revolution varieties adopted?
    7 months ago
  • chantelle wilson
    What are praise and criticism of the green revolution?
    2 months ago
  • Klaudia Hartmann
    How is the green revolution critical?
    24 days ago

Post a comment